Tuesday, June 30, 2009

LCS-I: Dead


The one chance to try to get some type of viable Corvette out of the dog's breakfast that is LCS, was the Israeli FMS version, LCS-I.

Well, looks like the Israeli Navy saw the elephant ... and IMAO made the correct decision.
The Israeli navy has dropped plans to purchase U.S. made warships and instead is exploring the possibility of a home-grown military shipbuilding industry, according to the website of Defense News.

The Ministry of Defense had originally planned on purchasing either the small Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) from Lockheed Martin or similar corvettes built by Northrop Grumman. However, costs for the LCS ships skyrocketed to $637 million, and costs for the corvettes were estimated at $450 million, both deemed prohibitive to the navy.

“As much as we sought commonality with the U.S. Navy, it became much, much more expensive than planned,” a naval source said. “At the end of the day, we had no choice but to face that fact that, for us, it was unaffordable."

Instead, the ministry is now considering building two ships based on the German Meko A-100 corvette at the Israel Shipyards in Haifa, where the project would give a much-needed shot in the arm to the economy.
The Meko A-100 is a fine ship that should fit well the Israeli requirement.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

You're only an O5, Skipper - and aircraft don't care


The JAGMAN results are out from the OCT 08 P-3 crash at Bagram, Afghanistan - and there is a lot here to learn from.

One of the great dangers of Command is that you are it. Unless you have a very good, secure, and well grounded CMDCM, XO, and WOs - there is a very real danger that the fact that you are "The Skipper" can warp the perspective of even the very best officer. You can quickly lose the perspective of who and what you are - and what you are there to do. Especially at the CDR Command level - sometimes you are looking at the next set of orders or future prospects that you forget to take care of what is right in front of you. You can forget that for now are are a Tactical level Commander - CAPT, DC, and Major Staff stuff will follow, but first thing first.

Our point man on the topic, Andrew Tilghman from NavyTimes has all you need to know, but here are the pull quotes for all to ponder relative to the second paragraph above.
The commanding officer of a P-3 Orion squadron who overshot a runway and crashed a specialized $93 million plane in Afghanistan last year was not current on his flight-hour requirements and was violating Navy rules prohibiting jet-lagged pilots from flying, investigators found.
Spies also tell me that his total pilot hours for a career were minimal for a Commander to begin with - which make the what follows even more of a "... should have seen that coming ..."
(The CO) brought the plane in too fast, hit the brakes and skidded off the runway. The starboard landing gear was sheared off, two starboard side propellers broke off and the right wing caught fire as the plane came to a stop, an investigation found. One crew member suffered a twisted ankle and all five walked away from the aircraft.

(He) had failed to meet the pilot proficiency requirements — at least 10 flight hours per month — for five of the six months preceding the crash, according to the Judge Advocate General Manual report, or JAGMan.

(He) assigned himself as pilot of the plane after he had traveled across 9½ time zones during the previous 46 hours. Despite regulations requiring several days of rest after such a trip, he took the controls 14 hours after arriving at a forward operating base, ...
Note the attitude. Physics and physical requirements do not care who you are. You can just see the rest.
(he) was unable to sign for the aircraft because his name was not in the maintenance database. But, the report said, he told the crew: “No question here. I am the CO and this is my aircraft.”

A crew member told investigators that (he) “had to be coached on nearly all aspects of the combat arrival.”

When asked why he failed to maintain pilot proficiency, (he) “
said that CO duties, his desire to spread flight time with junior pilots and aircraft availability” were factors.
How many times have we seen this in the last half-decade? Surface CO's with poor seamanship and Aviation CO's who do not have enough hours. At the Tactical level - what are we doing that prevents our Commanding Officers from maintaining their basic warfare qualifications?

As I have mentioned before, part of it is a mentality we have that pre-CDR Command people MUST go to War College --- MUST do this or that --- much of which is busy work ticket punching. But let's move on.
Under Navy rules, pilots should allow an additional day for each hour exceeding a three-hour time change. When asked why he didn’t follow those guidelines, (he) told investigators, “That’s never been our culture.”

Just before the crash, (he) failed to run through the landing checklist at 500 feet. He told investigators that the checklist is “just a technique.”
"Culture?" Interesting. P-3 folks out there - your accident rate this decade has spiked. What is your senior leadership doing about this. Like Gen. Mattis said last week, you get what you reward. Are you are not getting a focus on basic flight safety and primary warfare experience at your CDR Command level --- therefor you are not rewarding it? If not, what are you rewarding?
Lewis tried to blame the crash in part on the cockpit arrangement, saying he “did not have airspeed in my scan as much as I would” in other versions of the P-3.
Not familiar with your own squadron's aircraft? That is a pathetic excuse.
After the crash, when he climbed out of the burning plane, (he) laid down on the wing and put his hands over his head. He said he “stopped there for a second, when the enormity of the whole thing hit him.”

Two flight engineers grabbed his boot and yanked him off the wing as a crash crew responded to extinguish the flames.
Notice where the focus was. Shipmate or self?

I don't think we should beat up too much on the pilot. He has been beat up enough, and the fault is 100% his. Sure we lost an aircraft, but no one was killed. What should be done though is to look close at the culture and the process that got that crew to that point on that day.

Where were the checks and balances? What is the culture that allows an already relatively inexperienced pilot (I will not release it here, but the total career flight hours of the CO is significantly lower than what a CO should have and have had in the past) who wasn't even current to do what he did?

Sure, the CO failed himself and his Sailors --- but are their lessons here for Big Navy? From the emails I have received on this, yes. Once again, it is a leadership issue - one that Skippy reminded us of last year has roots to those Flag Officers who have already retired. That does not excuse the present leadership from not looking closely at the decisions of the last decade and the results and not taking action.

I hope they are. Next time we may not get so lucky. Even if P-3 senior leadership can't fix it - at the Tactical level there is everyting that the CO, XO, CMDCM, WOs and other leaders can do to simply say, "No."
UPDATE: In the same latest issue of the NavyTimes, there is an article that discusses the aircraft availability issue. Though not available online, in summary the P-3 community has: 154 aircraft. 62 mission ready; 58 waiting for depot work; 29 non-mission "bounce birds"; 5 special mission aircraft.

When the latest Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Group, Rear Admiral Mike Moran took over last year,
...he found that around 40% of the Navy's Orion pilots were not current on monthly flight hour requirements.
He has since brought that number down to 15% by establishing that as his top priority.

OK, I'll bite. Who has been held accountable for the 40% before he showed up?

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

I'll do it for half and for twice a long ..

Skippy, MTH, and LGB - I might need some EA's and field research assistants on this if I pick up the grant.
A CHEEKY artist has been given a £20,000 National Lottery grant - to look at girls' bums.

Sue Williams was given the cash to "explore cultural attitudes towards female buttocks".

She will create plaster cast moulds of women's behinds to try to understand their place in contemporary culture.


Sid, Byron and AW1, sorry - I don't think your tickers could handle all the, ahem, strain.

All artists, of course, have their biases .....


Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Sounds like "The Hurt Locker" got it right

Ed has some encouraging words about The Hurt Locker.
The Hurt Locker opened in New York and Los Angeles on Friday, and will go into wider release over this upcoming holiday weekend (I saw the film from a screener copy). This is a must-see film, not for any particular message but for anyone interested in an honest presentation of the kind of warfare fought in Iraq. On Thursday, I’ll interview Marc Boal on The Ed Morrissey Show in greater depth just as it opens on more screens.
Our hopes from April were not in vain it seems.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Where is Hugo standing?

Oh, he is with the deposed President of Honduras.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Sunday put troops on alert after a coup in Honduras and said he would respond militarily if his envoy to the Central American country was kidnapped or killed.

Chavez said Honduran soldiers took away the Cuban ambassador and left the Venezuelan ambassador on the side of a road after beating him during the army's coup against his leftist ally, Honduran President Manuel Zelaya.

The Honduran army ousted Zelaya and exiled him in Central America's first military coup since the Cold War, after he upset the army by trying to win re-election.
In that case, I'll stand with the Honduran military. I like my bastard better. Lefty wanted to remain in power unconstitutionally - and the military said, "No."

I'm ok with that. Hold the elections on time in 2010 an in the meantime put the next in line in the seat --- and all will be forgiven. If the military tries to stay in power, then to h311 with them.
UPDATE:I don't like this initial reaction by out SECSTATE. Why are we on the same side as Hugo and Fidel?
Yesterday the Central American country was being pressured to restore the authoritarian Mr. Zelaya by the likes of Fidel Castro, Daniel Ortega, Hillary Clinton and, of course, Hugo himself. The Organization of American States, having ignored Mr. Zelaya's abuses, also wants him back in power.
...
It's not surprising that chavistas throughout the region are claiming that he was victim of a military coup. They want to hide the fact that the military was acting on a court order to defend the rule of law and the constitution, and that the Congress asserted itself for that purpose, too.

Mrs. Clinton has piled on as well. Yesterday she accused Honduras of violating "the precepts of the Interamerican Democratic Charter" and said it "should be condemned by all." Fidel Castro did just that. Mr. Chávez pledged to overthrow the new government.
What did Zelaya do?
That Mr. Zelaya acted as if he were above the law, there is no doubt. While Honduran law allows for a constitutional rewrite, the power to open that door does not lie with the president. A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress.

But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do.

The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.

Calculating that some critical mass of Hondurans would take his side, the president decided he would run the referendum himself. So on Thursday he led a mob that broke into the military installation where the ballots from Venezuela were being stored and then had his supporters distribute them in defiance of the Supreme Court's order.

The attorney general had already made clear that the referendum was illegal, and he further announced that he would prosecute anyone involved in carrying it out.
...and the Hondurans?
Honduras is fighting back by strictly following the constitution. The Honduran Congress met in emergency session yesterday and designated its president as the interim executive as stipulated in Honduran law. It also said that presidential elections set for November will go forward. The Supreme Court later said that the military acted on its orders. It also said that when Mr. Zelaya realized that he was going to be prosecuted for his illegal behavior, he agreed to an offer to resign in exchange for safe passage out of the country. Mr. Zelaya denies it.

Many Hondurans are going to be celebrating Mr. Zelaya's foreign excursion. Street protests against his heavy-handed tactics had already begun last week. On Friday a large number of military reservists took their turn. "We won't go backwards," one sign said. "We want to live in peace, freedom and development."

Besides opposition from the Congress, the Supreme Court, the electoral tribunal and the attorney general, the president had also become persona non grata with the Catholic Church and numerous evangelical church leaders. On Thursday evening his own party in Congress sponsored a resolution to investigate whether he is mentally unfit to remain in office.
I think Mary O'Grady in the WSJ is right, the Hondurans that threw Zelaya out of the country are patriots. Our government is close to being on the wrong side of history.

If we stick to the vaporish words of the CINC,
"I call on all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms, the rule of law and the tenets of the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Any existing tensions and disputes must be resolved peacefully through dialogue free from any outside interference," Obama said.
... is about right. Unlike the first quote above, this is better from the SECSTATE,
"We call on all parties in Honduras to respect the constitutional order and the rule of law, to reaffirm their democratic vocation, and to commit themselves to resolve political disputes peacefully and through dialogue," Clinton said in a statement.
Maybe we can stay on the right side of history and not join Hugo. In the end though, the Hondurans seem to have things under control.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Sunday Funnies


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

More vulnerable and less trained ....

OK, I think I know Congress's new moto for the Navy.
Efforts by local congressmen to block moving a Norfolk-based aircraft carrier to Florida and to give more clout to opponents of the Navy's proposed outlying landing field won approval in the U.S. House in Washington on Thursday.

The measures were included in the House legislation that would authorize $680 billion for defense spending in 2010, including a 3.4 percent pay raise for all service members.

The House kept intact an amendment that would cancel spending $46.3 million to dredge the harbor at Mayport Naval Station near Jacksonville, Fla., in preparation for a new carrier. The amendment was written by U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye, D-2nd District, and co-sponsored by U.S. Reps. Randy Forbes, R-4th District, and Rob Wittman, R-1st District.

Nye said Thursday that the amendment was not a hard sell in the House.

"I think we had the power of logic on our side," he said.

The three legislators have said it doesn't make sense to authorize spending money for the dredging when the Navy has agreed to wait another year to make a decision on carrier homeports.

"The Department of Defense needs to first determine whether or not moving a carrier away from Norfolk is a good idea before they start spending money on the transfer," Wittman said in a written statement after the vote.

The money for the dredging would be redirected to construction and repairs at Navy and Marine Corps Reserve facilities.

The defense bill also includes an amendment by Forbes that would give communities more control over whether the Navy could construct an outlying landing field, or OLF, in their jurisdiction.

Forbes' amendment would allow a county being considered for an OLF to have a final say on whether to accept it. The Navy would be unable to build a landing field if the local government formally opposed it within 90 days of final site selection.

U.S. Rep. Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican, also successfully included an amendment to the House bill that would prohibit building an outlying landing field at Sandbanks or Hale's Lake in the northeastern part of his state. The Navy has considered those locations and three others in Virginia's Southampton, Sussex and Surry counties.
Joy. Myopic localism at its worst.

I think in Latin it is, Magis expositus quod minor instructus.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

I need to read Brideshead Revisited


I am serious. No kidding --- I just found a strange new respect for Evelyn Waugh --- no kidding.

This guy sounds exactly like the guy Skippy and I would want to go to war with ... here's why.

I enjoy driving off the Interstate. Likewise, I like to troll around old used book stores and the book sections of flee markets. Combine that with and interest in the under told stories of warfare - I bumbled into and interesting little book about an interesting and, at least to me, unknown corner of WWII. For example, Ken Ford's Assault on Germany : The Battle for Geilenkirchen.

If you crack it open to page 26 and started reading the following, I ask you; how could you not spit out a few bucks for this book .... and then not want to get hold of Waugh's
Brideshead Revisited?
Waugh had applied to the War Office for leave to complete his late3st novel - Brideshead Revisited (Everyman's Library Classics) - but was told that he had been found employment with Major-General Thomas as an ADC. At a meeting arranged over lunch a the Aperitif Restaurant in London, Waugh tried to warn Thomas that he was not the ideal man to be an aide-de-camp, but nonetheless the general was rather taken with the thought of having a literary celebrity on his staff and accepted the novelist for a week's trail.

It was a disaster. Waugh arrived at the Divisional HQ on Tuesday, 29 February, and was gone by the Thursday of the same week. The reason for his short stay and his relations with the general, were recorded in Waugh's diary:
The primary lack of sympathy seemed to come from my being slightly drunk in his mess on the first evening. I told him I could not change the habits of a lifetime for a whim of his. The HQ was architecturally deplorable and the staff glum and drab.
One of the staff officers at the HQ, Lieutenant-Colonel Williams Thomas, remembers Waugh's short stay and a quite different reason for his departure:
Evelyn Waugh was always pretty well 'oiled' and got sacked shortly after his arrival when he came gangling down the stairs in 'A' Mess singing, "His father was a harpist, his father was a harpist." Waugh had been checking in Who's Who and discovered that Thomas's father had been a harpist to Queen Victoria. We all thought it was hilarious. I do not thing Waught was ever forgiven for letting the cat out of the bag!
That is a character to go to war with ... for a couple of days only, perhaps.

He can room with Skippy.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Fullbore Friday


What a great name for a great man. Fair winds and following seas Lieutenant Commander Max Shean, RN.
Lieutenant-Commander Max Shean, who has died aged 90, was one of the small band of young men who, in the face of extraordinary peril, carried the sea war into enemy harbours; in the process they won a total of 68 awards for bravery, including four VCs; for his own exploits, Shean received a DSO and Bar.

His first mission was Operation Source, the attack by a flotilla of X-craft on the German battleship Tirpitz in north Norway in September 1943. The X-craft were manned by passage crews and towed there by parent submarines, while attack crews, including Shean's, prepared themselves in the towing vessels.

Disaster struck, however, when Shean's X-9, behind Syrtis, broke her tow and the passage crew was lost. The towrope became tangled round Syrtis's port propeller, and Shean, whose diving suit was in X-9, plunged over the side into the freezing waters. Wearing overalls weighted with steel bars in the pockets, Shean repeatedly duck-dived until he could free the tangled rope. Knowing that, if attacked from the air, Syrtis would dive and abandon him on the surface, Shean was more frightened than he had ever been; and when he was hauled on board, the submarine's commanding officer rewarded him with a brusque "Well done!"

One of the lessons of Operation Source was the potential for confusion during multiple attacks; so on Operation Guidance, in April 1944, Shean, now in command of X-24, was towed by Sceptre to Bergen, Norway, to make a solo attack on a large floating dock.

Shean successfully penetrated the fjords to reach the harbour, but faulty intelligence caused him to lay X-24's explosive charges under a 7,800-ton German merchant ship, Barenfels, instead of the floating dock. Otherwise it was a model attack, and 24 hours later, sick and suffering from headaches caused by the stale air in the boat, Shean and his crew rendezvoused at sea with Sceptre. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Order for his great courage, skill and determination in a most hazardous enterprise.

Following D-Day, Shean's flotilla was deployed to the Far East in command of an improved craft, XE-4. When Admiral Chester Nimitz, Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Ocean Areas, and an experienced submariner, saw his first XE-craft he declared it was a "suicide craft" which had no place in the Allies' order of battle. But when orders came from Washington to cut two underwater telegraph cables off Japanese-occupied Saigon, he found that the British midget submarines were the only force capable of achieving this.
Read it all.

Labels: , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Hannan Republicanism

Our Tory buddy, Daniel Hannan, MEP, has a nice prescription for the American right that is worth pondering.
Hannan: Yes, Europe has swung away from socialism. But it’s important for Americans to realize where Europe is starting from — it is quite normal on this side of the Atlantic for governments to take 45 or 50 percent of GDP in tax. So Europe’s swing to the Right and the U.S. swing to the Left still leave America less socialist than Europe.

None the less, the swing is significant for this reason. Voters are now way ahead of their politicians on the issue of tax and spend. While the political parties dance about trying not to use the word “cuts,” the electorate has clocked that reductions are urgent. The recession is forcing everyone to make economies: every business, every household. Do we really need two cars? Is there a cheaper mobile phone package? Can we get a better deal on insurance? They can see that it is possible — necessary indeed — to cut spending, but that such cuts need not have too deleterious an impact on our quality of life. And they simply can’t understand why the same logic doesn’t apply to the government. It is outrageous to exempt the public sector from the shrinkage of the economy — i.e., to tax the wealth creators even more in order to cushion the rest.

One of the reasons we Tories are leaving the EPP, and forming a new alliance of Euro-skeptic parties, is to make these arguments. We will put together a coalition of Atlanticist, free-market conservative parties that believe in national independence and parliamentary democracy. In doing so, we will break the monopoly in Brussels. Because, I stress this again, the “swing to the Right” was, in many cases, a swing to pantywaist Christian Democrat parties whose politicians, in the U.S., would be bang in the middle of the Democratic Party.

Advice for American conservatives? Only this. The Republican Party’s success depended on its becoming a popular party — that is, a party that was for the people against the governing elites. Half a century ago, it was a party of big business and old money, and it kept losing: it was in permanent opposition in both houses, and tended to win the presidency only when it fielded a non-partisan Ike-type candidate. Then it changed: it embraced localism, small government and states’ rights. It went from being a New England, preppy, country club party to being a Sun Belt, anti-Washington mass movement. And you know what? It started winning.

My worry is that, in recent years, the party has gone into reverse. It has become, as in pre-Goldwater days, the party of federal spending, budget deficits, external protectionism (the steel tariffs), overseas garrisons, the denial of states’ rights (the gay marriage amendment) and, latterly, bailouts and nationalizations.

I speak as someone who has a more uncomplicated loyalty to the GOP than to my own party, and I desperately want it to start winning again. But that means getting back to basics: to the basic idea that informed the U.S. Constitution, namely that decisions should be taken as closely as possible to the people they affect.
Hat Tip Andrew Ian Dodge.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Blimp, airships --- bring 'em on

Via The Economist, lighter than air; now more than ever
SPYING is a sophisticated and expensive business—and gathering military intelligence using unmanned aircraft can be prohibitively so. Predator and Global Hawk, two types of American drone frequently flown in Afghanistan and Iraq, cost around $5,000 and $26,500 an hour respectively to operate. The aircraft themselves cost between $4.5m and $35m each, and the remote-sensing equipment they carry can more than double the price. Which is why less elegant but far cheaper balloons are now being used instead.

Such blimps can keep surveillance and ordnance-guiding equipment aloft for a few hundred dollars an hour. They cost hundreds of thousands, not millions, of dollars. And they can stay in the air for more than a week, whereas most drones fly for no more than 30 hours at a time. They are also easy to deploy, because no airfield is needed. A blimp can be stored in the back of a jeep, driven to a suitable location, launched in a couple of hours and winched down again even faster.
Makes you wonder if anyone ever thought about putting a "ISR Blimp Kit" next to the FireScout on the back end of a LCS?

Persistent ISR; you've got it.

Remember the SECDEF quote from yesterday?
At least 20 countries use blimps—both global military powers, such as America, Britain and France, and smaller regional ones, including Ireland, Pakistan, Poland and the United Arab Emirates. Many are employed in Iraq. In November 2008 Aerostar International of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, began filling a $1.8m order for 36 blimps to be deployed by the American armed forces in Iraq. But Afghanistan may prove a bigger market. That is because it is difficult to pick up satellite signals in the valleys of that mountainous country. As a result blimps, adjusted to hover at appropriate heights, are often used to relay data to and from satellites.

As politicians around the world seek to cut public spending, the attractions of blimps are growing. In January America’s defence secretary, Robert Gates, told the Senate’s armed-services committee that the Department of Defence would pursue greater quantities of “75% solutions” that could be realised in weeks or months instead of “99% exquisite systems” that take more than a decade to develop. Barry Watts, an analyst at the Centre for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a think-tank in Washington, DC, says America’s air force has been criticised for not providing enough aerial data to “insatiable” ground forces. Blimps, Mr Watts reckons, will help them sate that appetite.
Nice.

Wouldn't mind a larger version for BAMS either .... but AeroStar can't fight the lobby efforts of Northrop-Grumman I bet.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Diversity Thursday


Why don't I get these ..... advice and comments. Yes, we have them .... and no, I don't have to make this racist stuff up.

Your tax dollars make it happen.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Good thing they don't run fast ...

The age of LawFare -- but still good w@r pr0n.


Hat tip Allah.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

SECDEF Gates: Salamander follower?

Yea, I wish.

Anyway - I can't believe I missed this from JAN. Right from the "Revolutionary vs. Evolutionary" file - SECDEF has learned the lessons of PPT and vaporware methinks.

A real fancy way of saying, "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."
"I will pursue greater quantities of systems that represent the 75 percent solution instead of smaller quantities of 99 percent, exquisite systems,"
Of course, that could mean deploying a "slick" LCS - but LCS is not his baby. It isn't his fault we have a Frigate sized, Tiffany priced gun boat to deliver SOF teams, but hey; if you need to ploy a field and don't have a tractor, then you might as well use the BMW in the driveway.

The attitude of 75% vs. 99% though is one that if taken forward towards shipbuilding may help the future.

Now, if we could just get him to tour a few Continental shipyards ....

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Retro Wednesday


Not sure of the ceremony. FADM Nimitz on the podium and N2S flyby.

|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

This is a Salamander crew type book

I am a long time fan of John Derbyshire. Just the title tells you his next book is worth pre-ordering.

Zen.


Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Name the veggie!


....that she uses to cover the lower half!
In a PETA campaign scheduled to launch in October, Che Guevara’s 24 year-old granddaughter, Lydia, poses half naked with the tag line ‘join the vegetarian revolution.’
Oh, how cute. Maybe Pol Pot's grandchildren will one day help sell blue zip-loc baggies by wearing them as hats or sump'n.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

MOH - Rep. Hunter (R-CA) is taking point

At last ... it is about time. I just hope he can find a Democrat with seniority to back him.
A California congressman who served two tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan convinced the House Armed Services Committee to order a full review of the criteria used for giving awards for gallantry and valor after a senior defense official said technological advancements and new combat tactics might be the reason fewer of the highest medals are being issued.

At the urging of Rep. Duncan D. Hunter, R-Calif., a Marine combat veteran elected to Congress in November, the armed services committee has asked for a review of trends in awarding the Medal of Honor to determine if the low number of awards in the current wars is the result of “inadvertent subjective bias amongst commanders.”

The committee also wants the Defense Department to survey officers and noncommissioned officers in leadership positions to look at attitudes about acts of valor. Hunter is looking for the reasons behind not just fewer nominations, but also a trend since the Vietnam War in which the only Medal of Honor awards have been for people who died during an act of valor.
While we are discussing today the evils of Transformationalism - will somebody please hit Gail McGinn with a ClueBat?
In a June 2 letter to Hunter that was released Wednesday, Gail McGinn, acting undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, said defense officials see nothing amiss in the Peralta decision.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who made the final call, “was advised by five independent reviewers who all individually concluded that the evidence included in the [Medal of Honor] recommendation did not support the award,” McGinn wrote.

The reviewers included a former commanding general of Marine forces in Iraq, a neurosurgeon, two pathologists and a Medal of Honor recipient, McGinn said.

Her letter also responds to Hunter’s larger question about whether the criteria have changed over time. A 2008 review of guidance used in making the awards “found no evidence of a posthumous requirement, either written or unwritten,” she said.

What has changed, McGinn said, is warfare. U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq “are inherently different from previous major conflicts,” she said.
Not only is that not based on fact (perhaps she should talk to Gen. Mattis) that is a huge insult to all those who have taken ground and engaged the enemy the same as others have throughout our history: face to face, hand to hand.

We could spend hours with examples from Iraq and Afghanistan alone that would prove that from the tactical standpoint (Where Medal of Honor are won), there is no difference between the fighting now and the fighting in 1969, 1951, 1944, 1918, 1898, 1863, 1066 .... amazing someone at that level in that position could say something so out of alignment with reality,

BZ Rep. Hunter - go get 'em.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Mattis on C2

Let's set some foundational truths. General Mattis, USMC is one if not the premier military minds of his generation. I count as an honor that I have worked with him.

He is also the most senior antitransformationalists we have. Here is what I ask of you. Look at your calendar today. Find an hour - if you don't have one eat your lunch at your desk. If that doesn't work, wait until you get home and the 'lil ones are in bed and the honey-do list is done. Get a cup of coffee or tumbler of good single malt, and then watch the video below.

Be in awe. I am. If you are running short of time, go to the 35:00 point.

Before we get to that though, get the Executive Summary about what he will speak of. Once again, General Mattis, USMC finds the right point of vulnerability.
US Marine Corps General James Mattis, head of US Joint Forces Command, cautioned against the military becoming too reliant on technology and command-and-control (C2) systems, which he believes could increase vulnerability.

During a 1 June speech in Washington, Gen Mattis, who also serves as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander for Transformation, called for moderating "our idea that technology is going to solve this human problem called war".
I really wish I could find a full transcript of this speech. Here is the meat of the article behind the firewall;
"War, he said, is primarily "a human endeavor [and] a social problem", so the US military should be careful in assuming what solutions technology might provide because its enemies have a history of avoiding their foe's strengths and exploiting weaknesses.

Overly relying on technical C2 systems and centralized decision making woudl cause the US military to become the "single most vulnerable military in the world", Gen. Mattis warned. Data and communications networks represent a 'single point of failure' that could be attacked, resulting in disabled command structures.
Exactly, hitting on a theme we touch on here on a regular basis, over reliance on technology is a false economy when you actually have to go to war. If you rely too much on the electronic spectrum and don't have a back-up ready to go - you will be defeated.

Here is the CSIS speech. In a word, awe.



Gen. Mattis is a national treasure. There, I said it.

We literally put our nation at Strategic and National risk by putting all our eggs in transformationalist ideas. Fact trumps theory. Lead and steel trump PPT. I cannot think of a person who understands this better, or makes a better argument about this subject, than Gen. Mattis.


On a larger scale, if you want to know the worst case scenario, out on the tail end of the bell curve, where our arrogant faith in non-robust technology and blinkered view about our critical vulnerabilities can go, check out what I am listening to now, William R. Forstchen's One Second After.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Sunday Funnies

When Annapolis grads get pets.


Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Going the right way ...

One thing I don't share all that much here is my passion for hunting - bird hunting to be specific. On top of all that, I am a Spaniel guy. Smaller the better.

For most of this decade, my favorite writer of the genre has been Chad S. Mason and his "A Bird Hunter's Diary" at GunDog Magazine.

You can't find it online, yet - but in the June/July edition of the magazine, we find that Chad has decided to stop writing.

It has often said that the wise out there pick their time - that if you listen close enough, you will know ... and the wise follow what they hear.

It isn't online ... I don't think Chad will mind, and I link to and highly encourage everyone to subscribe to GunDog Magazine, so I got the OCR software working right.

Even if you are not a hunter or lover of dogs - I recommend the read, mostly because you will see why I enjoyed reading him so much.
IF MEMORY SERVES, my first "Bird Hunter's Diary" column appeared in 2002. That would mean I've written almost 50 of these for a total of somewhere around 70,000 words. Looking back now, every word has been worth the writing and some of them perhaps have been worth reading. With mixed feelings, I now tum the last leaf in a book that has gone tattered, because it has gone exposed into many a thorny place.

You have been good to me, so I feel that you are owed an explanation for my departure. That may seem like a funny thing to say, since we have not even been formally introduced. But more than a few of you have, over the years, contacted me by phone or letter to express compliments and gratitude. Some of you have invited me to hunt with you, and your invitations I still keep in a special drawer in my desk, even if I have not been able (yet) to take you up on the offers.

A few more have been less charitable, but at least they were honest. Anyway, I suspect that we may in fact have met without knowing it. If you've ever arrived to hunt on public land in Iowa or Minnesota, and got there just in time to see a skinny fellow walking away from a dented old Dodge Neon-parked in your favorite spot-with a little black dog in front of him, well, that was me. Sorry I got there first. If it's any consolation, I never took too mauy.

For several years I have made a little bit less than a living as an outdoor writer. Little bits can accumulate over time, however, eventually amounting to quite a bit. So there is a bare, pragmatic, financial reason for my departure, but that is not finally the deciding factor. (You don't need to worry about me, by the way; I recently landed a "real job.")

John Lennon said, ~~Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." That's one of the few things he said that I agree with, and somewhere in those words is the reason I cannot write any more stories about hunting, at least for a while. About the time you read this, I'll wake up one morning and turn 40-not old, by any means, but older than I've ever been. A week before that, my oldest daughters will become teenagers; the week after, Rascal will turn 77 in dog years. Nobody is quite sure what happened to 'the years between these momentous milestones and the time Rascal and I went dawn-to-dusk in steep, slippery, snowy country on six young legs. Some time has gone missing, and stealthily so.

Other changes too have come upon me unaware, riding as stowaways on the years. At age 12, I bought my first outdoor magazine at the IGA Foods store in Greenville, Kentucky, and read it cover to cover. From then on, an outdoor writer was all I ever wanted to be. It still seems almost incredulous to me that I actually pulled it off, that there have been so many people willing to pay me to hunt, fish, and tell stories about hunting and fishing. Men who were my idols are now just a few pages away, to my left and to my right. They love what they do and I still admire them, but now I am surprised by a burning desire within myself to simply hunt, and not to hunt for a living. I want to walk the fields like you, without having to produce a tale or a picture.

One of my favorite writers is an Oregonian named Ted Leeson. In his wonderful book of fly fishing essays, Jerusalem Creek, Leeson observes that he tends to re-evaluate life every 10 years or so, shaking things up and rearranging. So I was probably overdue last summer when I walked into an antique shop in Des Moines,just tagging along with my parents, and found my grandfather's hunting coat hanging on a peg. Just like the one he had worn, it was made of stiff brown canvas with a soft flannel back liner and a corduroy collar. It had no tags and no logo, a relic from a less brand-conscious era when hunters were not walking billboards. Held shut by only three plastic buttons, it offered proof that there once was a time when hunters did not expect to be as comfortable outdoors as they arc indoors. It was pristine, and a perfect fit. Even for an outdoor writer, it was an easy decision at only $15.

My grandfather never got paid to go hunting, but he did have a few hunting magazines around in his later years. He mined coal for almost 35 years. He hunted on his days off, or whenever he was laid off. He hunted rabbits, squirrels and quail, and he ate them. Generally he fried them. If he was feeling fancy, he made gravy to go with them. As long as I. knew him, he shot everything with the same gun, a Remington Model 1100 Light 20. After an aneurysm had taken my grandmother, he remarried to a widowed schoolteacher w~o had done well saving her money. She bought him the 1100 on their first anniversary. She died in 1993 and he followed several months later.

Late last fall, I sold all my shotguns except his. At some point he had carved his initials (L.M.) into the plastic butt plate with his pocketknife. My father bought a new stock for the gun two years ago, because Granddad beat hell out of the old one, taking it exposed through many a thorny place. But we kept the butt plate. Granddad's initials remain visible, and seem to us like the signature on a cheap card that comes with an expensive gift, but for some reason never gets thrown away.

All of that is to say that the old canvas coat has provoked some re-evaluation of life, and some rearranging. This year I'll be hunting less, and enjoying it more.

My belief in the importance of this column has made it hard to quit even when I knew that I should. Besides practical information on bird hunting and the dogs that make it worth doing, this column offers at least occasional opportunities for celebration, questioning, lament, laughter and protest. I've attempted to explore all of the above at one time or another, while trying to avoid self-righteousness. If I have failed, the fault is entirely mine. If I have succeeded, I cannot accept all the credit; I had good role models.

Hopefully the editor can find someone to take up this concept and continue writing about the things that occur to people when they are out hunting. As for me, I'll probably still jot a few things down and save them up.

Thank you, and good night.
Another of his bits that had me nodd'n my head awhile back is here.

Well done Chad - it was a good run, and I think you are going out in this venue on top. I hope to read you again somewhere soon. If not, thanks.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Fullbore Friday


BZ to Berlin --- a proper tribute to a simple man, who in a simple act symbolized a reality of Communism and offered hope to some and inspiration to most.

A sad ending though for a man, who through a simple act, helped so much the cause of freedom.
On 15 August 1961 he found himself, aged 19, guarding the Berlin Wall, then in its third day of construction, at the corner of Ruppinerstraße and Bernauerstraße. At that stage of construction, the Berlin Wall was only a low barbed wire fence. As the people on the Western side shouted Komm rüber! ("come over"), Schumann jumped the barbed wire and was driven away at high speeds by a waiting West Berlin police car. Photographer Peter Leibing captured a photograph of his escape on film and it became a well-known image of the Cold War.

Schumann was later permitted to travel from West Berlin to the main territory of West Germany, where he settled in Bavaria. He met his wife Kunigunde in the town of Günzburg.[1]

After the fall of the Berlin Wall he said, "Only since 9 November 1989 [the date of the fall] have I felt truly free". Even so, he continued to feel more at home in Bavaria than in his birthplace, citing old frictions with his former colleagues, and he even hesitated about visiting his parents and brothers and sisters in Saxony. On 20 June 1998, suffering from depression, he hanged himself in his orchard near the town of Kipfenberg in Oberbayern.
One act in time though, Fullbore.


As a side note - how many of you catch the meaning of Jude's alblum Cuba cover?

Labels: , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Unknown Salamander discovered!


And who are you calling ugly?
... a salamander resembling E.T. and dubbed the ugly salamander. salamanders of this particular genus are rare, nocturnal forest dwellers that, in Ecuador arent generally found in forests above 3200 feet.
I actually prefer swamps and saltwater marshes.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Trust no one with your children ...


People often look at me funny when I tell them something along the lines, "There is nothing wrong with the kids now days. The problems all have to do with their parents, teachers, and the people we mistakenly outsource our parenting decisions to."

Mrs. Salamander found a perfect example of what I mean.

I am blessed; my children are voracious readers of books. They just devour them. Personally, I should open an American Girl library, I have them all. My preteen already reads at a college level and my youngest wants to catch up yesterday.

As a result, Mrs. Salamander is always on the lookout for good books, especially those with a historical bent, as the eldest takes after her father with her interest in all thing historical. Well, Mrs. Salamander spies Adèle Geras's (the accent over the "e" should have been a warning) book Troy. What does she read on the back?
A Publisher's Weekly Best Children's Book of the Year.
A Smithsonian Magazine Notable Book for Children.
... and so on. It is a thick book - which is good too as it will last.

What wonderful seeds are waiting in this book to sprout roots in your child's brain from this book?

Here are just a few samples.
"Come and lie down beside me," he said, taking the cup out of her hands and putting it on the flor next to the bed. "I'm sad. I haven't been as sad as this since my father died, when I was a small boy. Lord Hector - he spoke to me last night. Comfort me, Marpessa. Hold me, so that I can weep with no one to see me."

Marpessa looked at him and a dizziness came over her, so that she almost swooned. Without a word, she lay down beside him and put her arms around him. his head was on her breast. She stared over his shoulder at the wall. Oh, Lady Aphrodite, she said to herself, help me. What is happening to me? She was trembling all over.

"Look at me, " Alastor said, lifting his head level with her face. "And open your mouth."

Marpessa did what he said, and her heart...something...everything...melted like a honeycomb held near the fire, and she felt her whole body grow limp and heavy, and her mouth was filled with sweetness. She closed her eyes, and a wave of darkness washed over her as she fell back against the pillows with Alastor's weight and heat upon her. - (page 128)
...and so on.

I know, don't hate the player - hate the game. BTW, what did that take - 30 seconds - from "Hold me, so that I can weep ... " to "Open your mouth."? Impressive. I don't think even
Skippy can move that fast.

I don't know about you, but I don't know anyone who says "Open your mouth" before they kiss them. That must be ... ummmmm .... Kristen, for you I will not go further.


Back to the serious things.
That's Alastor's bastard, people would say ... unthinkable. A torture. And of her, a part that she didn't want ot listen to but that insisted on being heard, said in the wicked whisper of a snake, It will be a dind of punishment for him ... for the way he as treated you. Kill his child. It's what he deserves. Kill it. Soon. Rid your womb of every particle of his being. Cleanse yourself
"...I want to kill my child"

"How old? You don't look more than a child yourself."

"Here," Marpessa held her hand to her stomach. "It's not yet born.."

Mother poison made a sucking noise through her teeth.

"It's much easier to kill the ones that are already here. There are many ways of doing that. Are you quite sure you wouldn't prefer to wait, and hold a pillow over the infant's mouth? That's simplest."
- (page 264)
Friends don't let friend's children read books written by Boomers for children until a responsible adult reads them.

Did you know there is a Teacher's Guide for this book? I only found out while getting links for this post.

The Teacher's Guide states,
TO THE TEACHER

Troy and Ithaka are companion novels appropriate for readers in grades nine through twelve, or students ages fourteen to eighteen.
Ok. That is one definition of child - but perhaps on the back of the book they should be more specific ... and to many of us, a strong reading child is 9-12 years old. - the exact type that is attracted to Harry Potter length novels.

I am lucky that Mrs. Salamander has a good Mother's Sense about things. We've been burned before with "recommended children's books" lists. What is it about some adults that they think that children should be fed Penthouse Forum Lite stories and the worst parts of human nature - all packaged in post-modernest prose that is barely readable? I don't know, but they are sick people.

I'll take the sex and violence in the classics - they have stood the time of centuries and are fairly opaque. But this stuff? Plenty of time for such things in life. Can't we let 12 year olds be 12 year olds?

Even going beyond the 12 year olds, aren't there plenty of novels to give 9th graders than ones that have descriptions of head games for oral sex and pondering on if it is best to have an abortion or commit infanticide?

If not - then perhaps "Children's Book" has a very different meaning today. In the end, this only reinforces the fact that outside your house's door, no one is really looking after your child's childhood but you.

As a side note - if you really want to know why her book gets recommended - think about who runs the education schools and populates the education bureaucracy. Then read this review.
With exceptional grace and enormous energy, Geras recreates the saga of the Trojan War from a feminist perspective, ...
- Publishers Weekly (starred review)
Great. Doing for the Trojan war what Dan Brown has done for Catholicism.

Anne - it continues to be a shame you and Mrs. Salamander never met.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Diversity Thursday

Tell me again how you defend this horrid example of bean counting, CYA, discriminatory, patronizing, treatment. How?
Subject: NROTC Scholarship Option/Information
Date: [REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Good morning,

My name is [REDACTED], and I am a [REDACTED] with the Selection and Placement Division of the NROTC Scholarship Program in Pensacola, Florida. I am contacting you because of the outstanding application you submitted for the NROTC Program. Although our Four-Year National Scholarship application process for the fall of 2009 has closed, many scholarship opportunities are still available for you to begin college this fall.

One of the numerous scholarship opportunities that I want to make sure that you know about is our Historical Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Scholarship. HBCU scholarships are available at sixteen colleges and universities and provide the same benefits as our regular Four-Year National Scholarship. The only difference is that the HBCU scholarship may only be used at one of our participating HBCU colleges and universities. You will find all but three listed at the following link:

https://www.nrotc.navy.mil/hist_black.asp. The three that aren't listed are: Allen University, Columbia SC / Texas Southern University, Houston TX / and Tuskegee University, Tuskegee AL.

This e-mail does not indicate that you have, or have not been awarded the 4YR National scholarship that you previously applied for, so continue to check the NROTC Web-Site for those results. This is simply another great scholarship opportunity that you may want to consider if you are not awarded the other one.

If you are interested, and would like to possibly participate in the HBCU scholarship program, all you need to do is reply to me using the contact information provided below. I will be glad to verify your eligibility and guide you through the process. I look forward to helping you begin your college career.

Very respectfully,

[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Naval Service Training Command/[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED], FL [REDACTED]
COMM:(850) 452-[REDACTED]
DSN: 922-[REDACTED]
FAX: (850) 452-[REDACTED]
WEB: www.nrotc.navy.mil
To start with - I assume that they don't care what race you are, just that you go to a HBU? Huh? Then again, are just interested in what your DNA is and that you go to to a HBU? Do other universities get this special treatment? If I am blond haired and blue eyed and go to Howard University, I get a scholarship? If I am blond haired and blue eyed and go to Yale I don't?

Again, shame on all of us.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

BG Walsh, US Army - professional of the month

Make no mistake - DC duty is exceptionally difficult at the higher levels. You have to be a workaholic, a politician, and unquestionably and actor.

Watch him in action here.

Sir, I'll buy you a beer next time you head to The Irish Times.

BTW, wouldn't you love to hear what his "internal dialogue" was?
UPDATE Yea, this works for me.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

He should have gone to West Point

...because he has long range land navigation down pat. See the link for the story and to see what our buddy Chuck says.

Oh, if you are thinking of going to Annapolis - Professor Fleming has a primer for you.

Hat tip Deep Irish.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Battle of Midway - history down the memory hole

When reader The-Other-Jeff (as I know him) emailed me about this, to be honest, I didn't believe it. To quote TOJ;
... the word "Japanese" or "Imperial
Japanese Navy" were never uttered at the Midway Commemoration last Thursday at the Navy Memorial.
Sorry TOJ, you were exactly right; I'll never doubt you again.

This wasn't just any speech for any commemorative event by any schmo; this was the speech by the Chief of Naval Operations at the Navy Memorial in Washington DC to recognize the Battle of Midway. Read the whole speech here and come back. As for The Commandant's speech, I'll let the Marines deal with it - the CNO's speech starts about half way through after the Commandant's.

Not even a hint of anything "Japan" at all. Can we as an institution at least grow up and do honor to our history - and that of our once opponents and now friends? Can we stop patronizingly insulting the intelligence and professionalism of our Japanese allies?

The first four paragraphs are fine, but it went south after this line.
The Battle of Midway is the ultimate statement of our Navy Ethos and character.
It just wanders in a context-free haze it never seems to come out of. If we want to use The Battle of Midway as the USN Trafalgar, then we are not even close to leveraging it as we should.
Is this it?
...the strength of their character and firmness of their resolve- is why this battle is so significant in our history and why we commemorate it today.

... these pages tell the continuing story of extraordinary men and women whose honor, courage, and commitment created a true and proven hybrid force ready to meet any challenge to our nation’s security.
Weak horse. Yes, the earlier Ensign Evans quote is nice - but the Battle of Midway is so much larger than that. In para's 9 through 12 you can see a core of a speech that could be, but it is lost in the muddle that seems to drift in and out of other speeches in other venues - and in the process we lose the focus on The Battle of Midway and what it tells us.

Good googly moogly - give CDR Hendrix the charter to write that speech next year. Eeeekkkk, that vein on my forehead is going again.

For those who have had the pleasure of doing a tour with the Royal Navy or in close proximity to a critical mass of Royal Navy officers, then you know what Trafalgar Night is all about. You also know that there is no problem mentioning France and Spain - and the French and Spanish Navy officers in attendance have no issue with it.


This is not the time to use a pain-by-numbers method to have a speech written for the CNO to be delivered in the same tone and manner all other speeches are.

In another case of bad staff work, his staff did not change the title of the file they uploaded to the CNO's page to something that is even close to industry standards for the head of a serious organization. Here is the title of the speech. From that, I think we know who the author is. If the LT in the title isn't the author, then poor staff work having her name in the file. If the LT in the title is who wrote the speech we have an even larger vision problem than I think. A little time in Google will tell you all you need to know.

The LT is a fine person and officer, but for The Battle of Midway couldn't we get someone from the
Navy Historical and Heritage Command to write the speech at a minimum? Someone with at PhD in history at least? The Navy has spent a lot of money to give warfare qualified officers a PhD in history. We all know who they are and how to get in touch with them. All we needed to do is say, "We are looking for a good Battle of Midway commemoration speech for the CNO. Please submit a proposal by next month and we will let you know if yours is selected." You will have the biggest geek slap-fight since the iPhone came out just to see who would get the honor of having the CNO read that speech. (noth'n but love, my geeky Shipmates)

Those officers would produce a speech that was focused and in context ... and the Navy would utilize a vastly under utilized asset.


The Battle of Midway deserves more. If we continue to fumble this opportunity to reset our cultural mindset, The Battle of Midway might as well be the week everyone hands out the CFC paperwork, and about as relevant.
If you would rather hear it, go to the approx. 26:30 mark.




Next year let's give the CNO something to work with.
Speaking of writing for the CNO - who fed him this?
"To me the biggest challenge is to make the young people of our country aware of the opportunities and the excitement that exists in the United States Navy. The term that I use is that we have to make it possible for young people, diverse young people, to find the Navy. Because once you find the Navy, the future explodes."
Just for the enemy - I hope. The CNO is a serious man in a very serious position. Are we manning his Staff the way we should - so he as the very best support for the most important areas?

Anon gave us some more quotes from Collin's book
How The Mighty Fall: And Why Some Companies Never Give In that we talked about earlier this week. Might be worth a ponder for everyone, me included.
Some of the characteristics of leadership on the way down:
· People shield those in power from grim facts, fearful of penalty and criticism for shining light on the harsh realities.
· People assert strong opinions without providing data, evidence, or a solid argument.
· The team leader has a very low questions-to-statements ratio, avoiding critical input and/or allowing sloppy reasoning and unsupported opinions.
· Team members seek as much credit for themselves.
· Team members argue to look smart.
· Team members seek to blame.
· Team members often fail to deliver exceptional results.

Some of the characteristics of leadership on the way up:
· Bring forth unpleasant facts, no matter how ugly.
· People bring forth data, evidence, and logic.
· Employs high question-to-statement ratio, challenges people.
· Team members will credit others for success.
· Team members argue and debate not to improve personal position, but to find the best answer to support the overall cause.
· Each team member delivers exceptional results.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Sun Tzu of the Day

For those who have been to Bible study with me, you know that I cannot stand one-off Chapter and Verse quotations. I am a firm believer in the 10-up-and-10-down rule; you have to read the 10 Verses before and after the money quote in order to get a handle on the context. It is also helpful to have a copy of a parallel translations book as well ... but I digress.

So, there I am thumbing through Sun Tzu's The Art of War again, when I come across something we are all familiar with.
One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be endangered in a hundred engagements.
... but that isn't the best part, this is;
One who does not know the enemy but knows himself will sometimes be victorious, sometimes meet with defear. One who knows neither the enemy nor himself will invariably be defeeated in every engagement.
Make sure you are reading this from the Chinese perspective you round-eyed devil - this helps.
If I know out troops can attack, but do not know the enemy cannot be attacked, it is only halfway to victory. If I know the enemy can be attacked, but do not realize our troops cannot attack, it is only halfway to victory.

Knowing that the enemy can be attacked, and knowing that our army can effect the attack, but not knowing the terrain is not suitable for combat, is only halfway to victory. Thus one who truly knows the army will never be deluded when he moves, never be impoverished when initiating an action.

Thus it is said if you know them and know yourself, your victory will not be imperiled. If you know them and know yourself, your victory will not be imperiled. If you know Heaven and you know Earth, your victory can be complete.
This has to do with being honest with yourself and gathering proper intel, good honest intel.

What is the main threat to the US from hostile intel services from the Clinton Administration on? China. They know their Sun Tzu better than we know our Clausewitz.

I want to pick on the last line from above.
If you know them and know yourself, your victory will not be imperiled. If you know Heaven and you know Earth, your victory can be complete.
One can argue how much we really know China I presume, but from the Korean War on I think the 51% of the argument is that we know a lot less than we think.

Now, from a USN perspective, how well do we know ourselves?
Do we know?

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Retro Wednesday


Through 050602AUG09, or longer if my readers find more stuff - I am going to open up a new weekly series, "Retro Wednesday" - 0602 every Wednesday.

Retro Wednesday will focus on the Navy in the immediate post-WWII period prior to The Korean War as seen by those who where there. Just simple pics with little to any commentary.

I have to thank Sid for these; these are from his collection.

For the opening punch, a little something for the ladies and perhaps others.
The frustration of being selected for fighters, but due to war's end, ending up as plowbacks in N2S's at "U.S.N.A.S." Corpus Christi not evident:



Come back next week for another shot at America and her Navy; flush with victory and promise.

Oh, and next time you see the old fella with the oxygen tube in his nose and sitting in a scooter outside the Exchange; give him a nod. That is what his 6-pack looked like when he was in his early 20s - how about yours?

|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

What about Iran


I know a lot of people have been spending a lot of time on Iran - me notsomuch.

The reason is that I have long held that if the Iranians really want a free society, then they need to earn it just like America did - revolution.

They blew it with the '79 revolution, so they shouldn't expect anyone else to correct their mistake.

I wish the young Iranians well, but they will need to do this themselves. I'll support them, but that is about it. I don't want my nation doing much more than that either. No one will thank us for it in the long run if we did anyway.

Like a car, you will enjoy and take better care of something you buy yourself. The price of freedom is always paid in blood.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Business Worst Practices II: Electric Boogaloo

How many of you have seen the following books either on the desk or on the bookshelf of a senior military or civilian leader of the Navy in the last 15 years or so:
- Good to Great.
- Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies.

Well, I actually have Good to Great right behind me. The author, why Jim Collins of course.

He has a new book out, How The Mighty Fall: And Why Some Companies Never Give In. In it he has a "Five Stages of Decline."

Ponder a bit with an eye on the Navy for me.
Stage 1 is hubris born of success. The company's people become arrogant, regarding success as virtually an entitlement.

Stage 2 is the undisciplined pursuit of more — more scale, more growth, more acclaim. Companies stray from the disciplined creativity that led them to greatness in the first place, making undisciplined leaps into areas where they cannot be great or growing faster than they can achieve with excellence, or both.

Stage 3 is denial of risk and peril. Leaders of the company discount negative data, amplify positive data and put a positive spin on ambiguous data. Those in power start to blame external factors for setbacks rather than accept responsibility.

Stage 4 is grasping for salvation. Common "saviors" include a charismatic visionary leader, a bold but untested strategy, a radical transformation, a "game changing" acquisition or any number of other silver-bullet solutions.

Stage 5 is capitulation to irrelevance or death. Accumulative setbacks and expensive false starts erode financial strength and individual spirits to such an extent that leaders abandon all hope of building a great future. In some cases their leaders just sell out. In other cases the institution atrophies to utter insignificance.
The comparisons are inexact and there is some overlap. All stages could be argued in time and space, but I don't think you can argue that we are not fully in the tail end of Stage 3 with parts of Stage 4 already up on step.

Stage 5, when does that start -- and more importantly, how do you stop a decline?

If you remember the great comment thread from last week on LCS here and at USNIBlog on LCS - I think this quote hits the 10-ring.
"The signature of mediocrity," Collins concludes, "is not an unwillingness to change. The signature of mediocrity is chronic inconsistency.
If you work for a Flag Officer who has either of Collins's works in his office, get him a copy of the new one. If you have the inclination, send one to the CNO and COM NAVSEA.

Tell him Phib sent 'ya.

Hat tip Marshall Loab via Steven Spruiell.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

LCS: a parade of false horizons

Theory, meet reality.

In theory's corner - Train to Qualify:
Commander, Naval Surface Forces, is overseeing the development of a revolutionary training process for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) called Train to Qualify (T2Q) that will enable LCS’s hybrid Sailors to be fully trained before reporting to the ship.
...
Once a Sailor has been chosen to fill the LCS billet, their individual training track will then be made up for them and train them on the skills they are lacking. This will be completed by a combination of online, classroom and simulator training since they will be required to step aboard LCS ready to stand watch.

Every qualification will be performance-based, with set standards for timeliness, accuracy and quality applied to every critical task.

“The standard has to be very high for Sailors coming off of shore duty, so the ships have confidence that what they get is really a person that has received a qualification level of that fully supports taking the watch upon reporting aboard,” said Renshaw.
Yes, anytime you hear "revolutionary" - be worried.

In fact's corner - Navy IG:
The Navy’s heavy reliance on computer-based training is producing sailors who aren’t ready for their jobs at ships and squadrons, don’t grasp basic Navy concepts and could endanger the long-term health of the service, according to an internal report obtained by Navy Times.
Building on failure? Why this is a shock to anyone is, well, a shock to me. You simply cannot substitute underway training. SIM and CBT are nice secondary tools in some areas - but are weak cheese at best when it comes to actually doing it 24/7 at sea.

My money is on the prospect that once again the revolution failed where the evolution would have created process improvement.

Personally - I think part of our problem is in our inability to be honest with ourselves and be satisfied with simple, evolutionary, process improvement - a problem that comes from how we write FITREPS .... but that is a subject for a different day.

Hat tip Scott B.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Romney Redux?

As most of you know, in the last election I supported Giuliani, then Romney, and then McCain. (typical foam flecked wingnut, aren't I?)

While I was playing the role of Bull Conner with my firehoses and dogs yesterday, Mike Potemra put out something that has been bouncing around my nogg'n now and then over the last month.

Where can we find someone with a proven track record of fixing economic and programmatic cock-ups and has a track record of fighting spending and budget goofs?

Yep, Mitt Romney.
Four years from now, Mitt Romney will be president of the United States.

My reasoning is as follows. Point One: The Obama team, while still basking in honeymoon-level approval ratings today, has pointed itself in a direction that will result in disappointed hopes for the American people. They have drastically overpromised, and their policies—even if they are not outright disastrous—will end up inciting more passionate discontent than passionate support. Point Two: The Republicans always nominate for president the candidate who’s next in line, even if that person is deeply unpopular (e.g., the GOP base’s hatred for John McCain did not prevent him from being nominated; he was the guy who lost to Bush in 2000, ergo…). In 2008, the runner-up was Romney. Add to that frontrunner status the fact that Romney has credibility on economics and budgeting, and he’s the prohibitive favorite. Add Point One to Point Two, and the result is a Romney presidency.

A preemptive rejoinder, lest anyone dismiss this prediction as Romney propaganda: I supported McCain over Romney in 2008, and am nowhere near deciding whom to support in 2012.
Perfect? No. No one is. Right man at the right time to fix the fiscal house of disorder?

I can't think of anyone better - can you - I can't?

Enough of that for now though - 2010 first.

Labels: , , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Gundecking diversity at Annapolis

I've had to move things around a bit this morning. My commentary on the CNO's Battle of Midway speech has been moved to WED AM to make room for something that just cannot wait for Diversity Thursday.

One of my spies tipped me off to this yesterday and it simply has to be given above the fold treatment on HighTrafficMonday.

Do you remember Professor Bruce Fleming from Annapolis - we had a little fun with him last month. He comes out with an absolute powerhouse of an OP-ED in the Annapolis paper, The Capital.

We have all been flooded by the hype and hyper INFO OPS campaign about the new crop of Plebes.

Enough of the spin, time for some truth. Read it all - but here is the meaty bits.

A "diverse" class does not mean the Naval Academy recruits violinists, or older students (they can't be 23 on Induction Day), or gay people (who are thrown out) or foreign students (other than the dozen or so sent by client governments).

It means applicants checked a box on their application that says they are Hispanic, African American, Native American, and now, since my time on the Admissions Board of the Academy, where I've taught for 22 years, Asians.

Midshipmen are admitted by two tracks. White applicants out of high school who are not also athletic recruits typically need grades of A and B and minimum SAT scores of 600 on each part for the Board to vote them "qualified." Athletics and leadership also count.

A vote of "qualified" for a white applicant doesn't mean s/he's coming, only that he or she can compete to win the "slate" of up to 10 nominations that (most typically) a Congress(wo)man draws up. That means that nine "qualified" white applicants are rejected. SAT scores below 600 or C grades almost always produce a vote of "not qualified" for white applicants.

Not so for an applicant who self-identifies as one of the minorities who are our "number one priority." For them, another set of rules apply. Their cases are briefed separately to the board, and SAT scores to the mid-500s with quite a few Cs in classes (and no visible athletics or leadership) typically produce a vote of "qualified" for them, with direct admission to Annapolis. They're in, and are given a pro forma nomination to make it legit.

Minority applicants with scores and grades down to the 300s with Cs and Ds (and no particular leadership or athletics) also come, though after a remedial year at our taxpayer-supported remedial school, the Naval Academy Preparatory School.

...
All this is probably unconstitutional. That's what the Supreme Court said about the University of Michigan's two-track admissions in 2003.

Once at Annapolis, "diverse" midshipmen are over-represented in our pre-college classes, in lower-track courses, in mandatory tutoring programs and less challenging majors. Many struggle to master basic concepts. (I teach some of these courses.)

Of course, some minority students are stellar, but they're the exception. Despite being dragged toward the finish line, minorities graduate at about a 10 percent lower rate than the whole class, which of course includes them (so the real split is greater).

Don't want to believe me? Have a lawyer sit in on a year's worth of Admissions Board deliberations. Or better still, pray that one of the stellar white students rejected to give a seat to a "diverse" candidate sues us. That's the only way taxpayers will ever fully understand the price to them of "putting diversity first."
Show your support for Professor Fleming. Follow the link to the OP-ED, register, and comment. After you register you can rate the comments. Through Sunday, I could already see the Diversity Bullies trying to spike supportive comments with negative ratings on supporting comments. Show your support. Register and vote on comments.

If you like the cut of his jib, visit his
website here. If you are interested in his books, you can find links to them there or at the widget below, or here.



As I have stated before when it comes to double standards, there is also a fair bit of intellectual cowardice and professional buck-passing by leadership for not having one standard for all. Those who thrive on their Diversity fetish can preen about their entrance numbers - damn the consequences for the individuals and institution. You can fudge a lot of things, but when people get to the fleet, especially in low margin for error areas - eventually people will have to perform.

When as a group you do not come in with a equal set of tools as everyone else, you won't perform as well as a group either. You won't get ranked as high as a group. You will wash out at a higher rate as a group. The individuals hurt most are the ones who were given special treatment in the first place - they will have wasted years pursuing a career they never had a chance to excel in compared to their peers.

When we get to that point, do you have a right to accuse a CO of racism because his minority officers, on average, take longer to qualify and have a higher wash-out rate? Or, do you force him to push his problem on to the next UIC? The road to h3ll is paved with good intentions.

The one of the most injured parties however, are those who could enter and qualify on their own merits regardless of race, creed, color, or national origin. They will forever be tainted by the paternalistic racism that is a double standard. They will always know that most will wonder if they got in on their own merits or were given special consideration based on nothing but their genetic background. That is the tragedy of affirmative discrimination. Almost as bad as those who are not selected in the zero-sum-game that is admissions, simply because of their genetic background.

For an institution that likes to think of itself as a meritocracy, this dual track system is a great shame on us all.

Professor Fleming is speaking for those who cannot. Watch, learn, and if you are in a position, support. Facts and truth are rare and precious things. The Diversity Brown Shirts will be coming after him with renewed vigor. Once again, show him the support he deserves.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Who is that Sailor's Chief?

When someone answers, "Chief Vanderberg" --- you know that you won't have any more trouble with that Sailor.

First impressions are so important. I think he is happy and having a good time in this picture, with friends and family.


Now, imagine you are a 19-yr old Sailor who just became a post-0645-phone-call-from-the-CMDCM-to-the-Power-Plants-shop, "Administrative Burden." Ah, the efficiency of Navy Chiefs.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Sunday Funnies



Hat tip Andy.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

China plays with McCain's tail


Fun times. Fun times.
In what a U.S. military official calls an "inadvertent encounter," a Chinese submarine hit an underwater sonar array being towed by the destroyer USS John McCain on Thursday.

The array was damaged, but the sub and the ship did not collide, the official said. A sonar array is a device towed behind a ship that listens and locates underwater sounds.

The incident occurred near Subic Bay off the coast of the Philippines.

The official, who declined to be named because the incident had not been made public, would not say whether the U.S. ship knew the submarine was that close to it.

However, the Navy does not believe this was a deliberate incident of Chinese harassment, as it would have been extremely dangerous had the array gotten caught in the submarine's propellers.

The Navy has complained in the past that Chinese vessels, including fishing boats, have deliberately tried to disrupt U.S. naval activities in international waters near China. In one widely publicized incident in March, five Chinese vessels maneuvered close enough to the USNS Impeccable to warrant the use of a fire hose by the unarmed American vessel to avoid a collision. The Navy later released video of that incident.
Don't you love the words we use? That was about as much of an accident as this was.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

GM meets the classified INSURV

Earlier this week I grabbed hold of GM and the Navy as a talking point --- and Chap has found another example. Head on over to his place for a great example to ponder, one that bought out this 5-Star comment from 'ole Chap.
...INSURV results have to be not only unclassified but public; only embarrassment will fix some problems. Classification, especially the insidious “unclassified but special” categories we invented after 9/11, can invite overcontrol of information, improper use and worse. Special places to go look at stuff invite special tweaking. Every boat I knew at one point took the exercise equipment out of the engine room for the inspection, then put it right back in afterward…and everyone knew it, and so did the inspectors. This example is silly, not dangerous; however, there are dangerous ones out there. What are they and how do we correct them?
Amen. Dude should do a spin off post at USNIBlog.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Need 10 large?

NORTHROP GRUMMAN
ANNUAL ROBOTICS
ESSAY CONTEST



GOAL: DISCUSS THE MOST PRESSING NEEDS
WHERE ROBOTICS MAY BE A SOLUTION


The Challenge: "Next year, the US Air Force will procure more unmanned aircraft than manned aircraft," Air Force Lt. Gen. Norman Seip, commander of Twelfth Air Force (Air Forces Southern), has predicted. Will advances keep up with the needs of our military, first responders and the hazmat industry? Have developers bumped up against technological obstacles, or are new breakthroughs the inevitable outcome of ongoing research?

About Robotics: The extraordinary capability of hazardous duty robotics to save lives on the battlefield is an extension of similar work ranging from local law enforcement to hazmat and first responders. In the field of science they have made possible the exploration of hostile environments from space to the crushing depths of our oceans. The ability to control these remarkable machines remotely, from great distances has implications for safety, costs and control of missions that would otherwise be impractical. Often great advances in technology come as distinctions between the scientific disciplines blur. The new science produces startling new capabilities that open advanced applications from those willing to peer into the future. Few have more practical uses than robotics.


* * CONTEST HIGHLIGHTS * *

Eligibility: Open to all members of the Naval Institute. Join at www.usni.org

Focus: New and Enhanced Applications for Robotics.

Papers Due: July 15, 2009. Submit to essays@usni.org with full contact information.

Publication: Winners will be announced and will publish the work, in the September, 2009 issue of Proceedings.

Cash Awards: Will be presented at USNI Honors Night, in October 2009.

* * CONTEST AWARDS * *

1ST PRIZE - $10,000 & LIFE MEMBERSHIP
2ND PRIZE - $5000 & LIFE MEMBERSHIP
TWO 3RD PRIZES - $2500 & ONE-YEAR MEMBERSHIP

|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Early LCS deployment ... or cheesy yet dangerous PR stunt?

This reeks of a poorly thought out PR stunt.
Navy officials in the Pentagon and Fleet Forces Command are studying the possibility that the Navy’s first littoral combat ship, Freedom, could make a short deployment earlier than planned, on the orders of Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead, the Navy confirmed Friday.

Roughead ordered the studies after Freedom finished the second half of its acceptance trials May 22, Navy spokesman Lt. Clay Doss said.

“The CNO is interested in employing the unique capabilities of this new class of warship as soon as practical, taking into consideration the milestones associated with a first-of-class warship,” Doss told Navy Times.
Good googly moogly - if they were to do this before the ship's capabilities from engineering, habitability, to damage control are yet to be figured out ... then hey, interesting concept. She will be shooting blanks.

The fact will remain that she will deploy "slick" i.e. no mission modules. Just her base loadout.

The only thing she can do is chase pirates with a 57mm gun up front, operators in RHIBs and .... well ... that is about it. That is what we are getting?

Oh well, good luck with that --- by doing that you just validated all your critics. In the end you are going to deploy it as a traditional gunboat - a very expensive traditional gunboat .... the size of a large corvette/small frigate.
Under its initial schedule, the ship was not to deploy until 2012. First it must complete batteries of tests at Naval Station Norfolk, Va., then experiment with its multi-use mission modules at Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City, Fla., and then sail to its homeport at Naval Base San Diego.

But the Navy needs LCS now, Doss said.

“As we have said before, LCS is needed now to close urgent war-fighting gaps that our Navy faces today.”
Experience says that if you go to soon you are taking a huge risk for minimal reward. Good luck to the crew. They deserve a ship ready to go, not one that is half-baked.

There is nothing in the pirate world that cannot be done without LCS. If so, then the Fleet is in worse shape than we are telling the public. If not, then, well, I'll let you figure it out.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Democrat culture of corruption?


Oh my, that turning worm has some spiky bits.
The revelation that Democratic appropriations kingpins may face a House ethics investigation of their campaign receipts from lobbyists for recipients of government grants and contracts moves Republicans closer to gaining a corruption issue in 2010.

Republicans know well how lapses in ethical standards can sink a political party. They lost control of the House in the 2006 midterm election, succumbing in part to accusations from Democrats that the GOP had produced a "culture of corruption" in which lobbyists showered gifts on lawmakers in exchange for government contracts and other legislative favors.

The Democratic chairman and senior Republican on the House ethics committee dropped their political bomb Thursday night, announcing that the panel is reviewing the practice of lawmakers steering money and contracts to favored companies, and then receiving campaign contributions in return for the "earmarks."

The announcement came months after the Justice Department began a criminal investigation of the matter and a repetition of House votes on Republican motions — all of them defeated — calling for an ethics probe of lawmakers who engage in what is often called a "pay-to-play" system for funneling federal dollars to select companies and projects.

The review could turn into a full-blown ethics investigation later, with the potential for scathing reports that could become campaign fodder.

Democratic Reps. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, Pete Visclosky of Indiana and Jim Moran of Virginia, all members of the money-dispensing House Appropriations Committee, received significant campaign donations from lobbyists from a defunct firm, PMA, and its clients — companies that got money for pet projects.
This little jewel won't help much either. Sen. Burr (R-NC) must be very happy.
The wife of former North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley has been fired from her $170,000-a-year position at N.C. State University.

UNC system president Erskine Bowles announced Mary Easley's termination Monday, hours after the school's chancellor resigned over the controversy.

Meanwhile, e-mails released by N.C. State indicate the former governor was involved in the school's hiring of his wife, who had refused to step down despite calls from top university officials.

Mary Easley ran a speakers series and an academic center dealing with law enforcement training. She began at the university as a teacher.

The e-mails were released as Chancellor James Oblinger became the third school official to leave a post in the flap over Mary Easley's job.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A top North Carolina education official has resigned amid questions about his role in the controversial hiring of a former first lady for a university post.

North Carolina State University Chancellor James Oblinger said in a statement released Monday by the university that he is stepping down because the scrutiny of a job given to former first lady Mary Easley is a distraction for the school. Easley was hired when her husband, Mike Easley, was governor.

Oblinger had asked Easley to resign her position, but she hasn't.

N.C. State has been under fire because of a severance package Oblinger gave to the official who hired Easley and because of the salary Easley received. The official, former provost Larry Nielsen, resigned last month.
...and yes - it is that Erskine Bowles.

Let there be more cleaning, it is good for the system.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Fullbore Friday


In comments on last week's FbF, regular commenter ewok40K mentioned something that had me do a little pondering.
This is as fullbore as tales my granddad told about facing Me-109s in an outdated fixed-landing gear gull wing PZL P-11 capable of barely 360 kph...
Many people forget that Britain and France went to war over Poland. That is where it started - and in the end we left her to the Communists.

Poor Poland, Nazi on one side, Communists on the other. The Polish military can hold its head high, it fought as best as it could. The nation that saved Vienna and therefore Europe from the Ottomans went down fighting - and continued fighting throughout the war.

In the West we tell our stories because they are so well documented. Much of what Poland did is not well known - and outside Poland their heroes unknown.

In that light, today let's take a chance to give a nod of the head to a blog-buddy's Grandfather and his friends in the Brygada Pościgowa and their plucky gull-winged PZL P-11. They knew what the story was, but fought on.







More real pics here.

Labels: , , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

When Arthur B. Laffer speaks ...


I listen.
Here we stand more than a year into a grave economic crisis with a projected budget deficit of 13% of GDP. That's more than twice the size of the next largest deficit since World War II. And this projected deficit is the culmination of a year when the federal government, at taxpayers' expense, acquired enormous stakes in the banking, auto, mortgage, health-care and insurance industries.

With the crisis, the ill-conceived government reactions, and the ensuing economic downturn, the unfunded liabilities of federal programs -- such as Social Security, civil-service and military pensions, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, Medicare and Medicaid -- are over the $100 trillion mark. With U.S. GDP and federal tax receipts at about $14 trillion and $2.4 trillion respectively, such a debt all but guarantees higher interest rates, massive tax increases, and partial default on government promises.

But as bad as the fiscal picture is, panic-driven monetary policies portend to have even more dire consequences. We can expect rapidly rising prices and much, much higher interest rates over the next four or five years, and a concomitant deleterious impact on output and employment not unlike the late 1970s.
...
The percentage increase in the monetary base is the largest increase in the past 50 years by a factor of 10 (see chart nearby). It is so far outside the realm of our prior experiential base that historical comparisons are rendered difficult if not meaningless. The currency-in-circulation component of the monetary base -- which prior to the expansion had comprised 95% of the monetary base -- has risen by a little less than 10%, while bank reserves have increased almost 20-fold. Now the currency-in-circulation component of the monetary base is a smidgen less than 50% of the monetary base. Yikes!
...
It's difficult to estimate the magnitude of the inflationary and interest-rate consequences of the Fed's actions because, frankly, we haven't ever seen anything like this in the U.S. To date what's happened is potentially far more inflationary than were the monetary policies of the 1970s, when the prime interest rate peaked at 21.5% and inflation peaked in the low double digits. Gold prices went from $35 per ounce to $850 per ounce, and the dollar collapsed on the foreign exchanges. It wasn't a pretty picture.

Now the Fed can, and I believe should, do what it must to mitigate the inevitable consequences of its unwarranted increase in the monetary base. It should contract the monetary base back to where it otherwise would have been, plus a slight increase geared toward economic expansion. Absent this major contraction in the monetary base, the Fed should increase reserve requirements on member banks to absorb the excess reserves. Given that banks are now paid interest on their reserves and short-term rates are very low, raising reserve requirements should not exact too much of a penalty on the banking system, and the long-term gains of the lessened inflation would many times over warrant whatever short-term costs there might be.

Alas, I doubt very much that the Fed will do what is necessary to guard against future inflation and higher interest rates. If the Fed were to reduce the monetary base by $1 trillion, it would need to sell a net $1 trillion in bonds. This would put the Fed in direct competition with Treasury's planned issuance of about $2 trillion worth of bonds over the coming 12 months. Failed auctions would become the norm and bond prices would tumble, reflecting a massive oversupply of government bonds.

In addition, a rapid contraction of the monetary base as I propose would cause a contraction in bank lending, or at best limited expansion. This is exactly what happened in 2000 and 2001 when the Fed contracted the monetary base the last time. The economy quickly dipped into recession. While the short-term pain of a deepened recession is quite sharp, the long-term consequences of double-digit inflation are devastating. For Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke it's a Hobson's choice. For me the issue is how to protect assets for my grandchildren.
If you are scratching your head, read it all.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Diversity Thursday

This is where the Diversity Bullies will take you if you do not oppose them.

This is long, but well worth it. Don't be ignorant.



Hat tip Allah.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Hey, they're getting all blogg'y over yonder

Though we all like to poke at TheNavelEnquirer .... errrr .... Navy Times now and then (everyone needs to be chided now and then, your host included, it keeps you sharp), they actually have some good writers and hail fellows well met.

I have been a subscriber for well over two decades and think they do a fine job. I don't ask of them anymore that what I want my readers to ask of me - not perfection, but an honest effort. I think they do that.

Well, a few of them, Ewing, Tilghman, and a couple of others have a cute little group blog going on over there that is worth the visit - after you visit CDR Salamander, of course.

The Scoop Deck.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Liberty minded 1120's ... what 'cha do'n on 160010JUN


Being that our submariner buddies are about the last Navy types left in New England - stealing every word from Paul --- I thought you might find this of interest.
On April 15th, over 3,000 people showed up on the lawn of the Rhode Island statehouse to participate in the local Tax Day Tea Party. As a follow up to that protest, local organizers are planning another event today, June 10th. This is the day, in 1772, Rhode Island colonists burned the Royal Navy schooner Gaspee to take a stand for their economic freedom. The goal of today's gaspee Tea Party is to encourage local politicians to reduce the state's deficit without raising the sales tax or property taxes. We want to invite everyone in the area to show up on the lawn of the Rhode Island statehouse between 4pm and 6pm. There is a lot of work to do, and this is just a beginning, but when your state motto is "Hope," change can't be far behind. More on the Gaspee can be found at www.gaspee.org.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

I see your metacenter and raise you a thingamabob

If you haven't been following my spin-off post at USNIBlog "Sen. Yoda (J-DH), you have the floor," you are missing some LCS fun-times.

Byron is in the middle of a shipfitter-engineer-boatgeek bar fight. Chairs are flying through the air, windows breaking, aluminum melting, GURLs are screaming, old-farts stealing whiskey shots from distracted fighters .... good times ... good times.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

NYT on Horse Soldiers


So, the NYT does a review of the book I mentioned last week, Horse Soldiers: The Extraordinary Story of a Band of US Soldiers Who Rode to Victory in Afghanistan.

What could go wrong? Ha!

First, the NYT is the NYT. Being that this is a military novel, the reviewer must be an environmental writer .... and the illustration you see in the upper right goes with it --- by Matt Dorfman of all people.

What do you get?
If I were Donald Rumsfeld’s son, I’d give him “Horse Soldiers” for Father’s Day. During his tenure as George W. Bush’s defense secretary, Rumsfeld championed a mode of warfare that relied on limited numbers of soldiers armed with high-tech equipment and backed by precise, devastating air power. The Rumsfeld doctrine clashed with the Powell doctrine, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s theory that wars are best won with overwhelming ground forces, specific political goals and a clear exit strategy. Rumsfeld carried the day, and has left us in a hell of a fix in Afghanistan and Iraq.
...
Doug Stanton tells the story of that brief shining moment in “Horse Soldiers,” a rousing, uplifting, Toby Keith-singing piece of work. This isn’t Afghanistan for those who enjoy (I use the word loosely) Iraq through the analytical lens of a book like “The Assassins’ Gate,” by George Packer. It’s for those who like their military history told through the eyes of heroic grunts, sergeants and captains. Think of Stephen E. Ambrose’s “Band of Brothers” or Stanton’s own best seller, “In Harm’s Way,” the story of the survivors of the cruiser Indianapolis, which sank in shark-infested waters during World War II.
Is it possible to smell a snear?

Harumph. Head on over to Greyhawk's place to read an excerpt - decide for yourself - then buy the book to pi55 off the NYT and their moonbats.




Labels: , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Through war .... a civil society

A very interesting bit from The Economist that puts some scientific backbone behind what those in the military, police, firemen, etc kind of know intrensically, but are not sure if it is just gobbledegoop.
People are altruistic because they are militaristic, and cultured because they are common. At least that is the message of a couple of new studies

WO of the oddest things about people are morality and culture. Neither is unique to humans, but Homo sapiens has both in an abundance missing from other species. Indeed, that abundance—of concern for the well-being of others, (even unrelated others), and of finely crafted material objects both useful and ornamental—is seen by many as the mark of man, as what distinguishes humanity from mere beasts.

How these human traits evolved is controversial. But two papers in this week’s Science may throw light on the process. In one, Samuel Bowles of the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico fleshes out his paradoxical theory that much of human virtue was forged in the crucible of war. Comrades in arms, he believes, become comrades in other things, too.
...
Dr Bowles’s argument starts in an obscure cranny of evolutionary theory called group selection. This suggests that groups of collaborative individuals will often do better than groups of selfish ones, and thus prosper at their expense. It is therefore no surprise, according to group-selectionists, that individuals might be genetically predisposed to act in self-sacrificial ways.

This good-of-the-group argument was widely believed until the 1960s, when it was subject to rigorous scrutiny and found wanting. The new theory does not pitch groups against groups, or even individuals against individuals, but genes against genes. It does not disallow altruistic behaviour, but requires that this evolve in a way that promotes the interest of a particular gene—for example by helping close relatives who might also harbour the gene in question. The “selfish gene” analysis, so called after a book by Richard Dawkins, makes good-of-the-group outcomes almost impossible to achieve.
...
Dr Bowles has focused the argument on war, since it is both highly collaborative and often genetically terminal for the losers. In his latest paper he puts some numbers on the idea. He looks at the data, plugs them into a mathematical model of his devising and finds a pleasing outcome.

To gather his data, Dr Bowles trawled through ethnographic and archaeological evidence about warfare between groups of hunter-gatherers. This is rarely war in the modern sense of planned campaigns. It is more a matter of raids, ambushes and fights between groups who have met accidentally. It is, nevertheless, quite lethal. Dr Bowles identified eight ethnographic and 15 archaeological studies that met his criteria of reliability and abundance of data. They suggest that 12-16% of mortality is the result of such low-level warfare. This is a figure much higher than, for example, the mortality caused in Europe by two world wars, and is certainly enough to drive evolution. But the question remained of whether it could drive group selection.

It was to test that idea that Dr Bowles devised his model. Although it pitches group against group, it is strictly based on the idea of selfish genes. It looks at the benefit to a notional gene that promotes self-sacrifice. The question is, does such a gene do well if individuals having it belong to a group that takes over the territory and resources of a similar, neighbouring group, but at the risk of some of those individuals losing their life in the process? What is the maximum self-sacrificial cost that can evolve in these circumstances?

In the absence of war, a gene imposing a self-sacrificial cost of as little as 3% in forgone reproduction would drop from 90% to 10% of the population in 150 generations. Dr Bowles’s model, however, predicts that much higher levels of self-sacrifice—up to 13% in one case—could be sustained if warfare were brought into the equation.
So, war for a civil society?

Heck, maybe there is more to it than just keeping the bad guys out ... it keeps the good guys good.

However, how does explain the Mongolians?

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Phibian TV

The long march to sanity continues.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Jack Dunphy speaks for me

As you may have gathered, I was trying to word right a reaction to Ed vs. publius - I still don't think I hit it quite right.

Jack Dunphy is to the LAPD what I am to the USN, except he is much better at his writing than I am at blogg'n. He nails about 95% what I wish I wrote.
As NRO’s longterm pseudonymous writer, I’ve taken great interest in the Ed Whelan vs. Publius dustup. The thought occurs that in unmasking Publius, his apology notwithstanding, Mr. Whelan has inadvertently hung a target on my back, inviting anyone on the left so inclined to seek to expose me in an act of digital revenge. I pray this doesn’t come to pass, as it would in all likelihood effectively end my career with the Los Angeles Police Department.

I’m grateful to my editorial masters at NRO for allowing my use of the pseudonym and for maintaining the secret all these years. When I wrote my first piece for them on a lark back in the summer of 2000 I had little idea I would still be at it nine years later. In that time I’ve managed to vex two mayors, two police chiefs, and any number of their respective underlings, any or all of whom would no doubt be gratified to see me unmasked and silenced once and for all.

To those who claim my use of a pseudonym is cowardly, I can only say I wouldn’t have lasted as long as I have in my “day job” if I hadn’t overcome any cowardly inclinations I may have once had. I keep the details of my assignment vague in my writing so as to safeguard my identity, but readers can be reassured I’ve spent little time behind a desk, and I hope to keep it that way until such time as I choose to retire.

I hope that over these nine years I’ve provided NRO readers with insights into the world of law enforcement, but the only way I can continue to provide those insights while remaining a police officer is to do so from the security afforded by my pseudonym. I’ve been warned by people in positions to know such things that my career would be in jeopardy should my identity become known.
That about describes where I am.

One note though, I have spent WAY too much time at a desk .... but don't we all?

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Kilcullen kalls is kwits?

Agree or not, Kilcullen is always worth a ponder.
A top counter-insurgency expert says Pakistan is not a "lost cause" but without wholesale change the country risks spiralling into lawlessness.

Australian David Kilcullen was the senior adviser to US General David Petraeus and helped engineer the surge strategy that resulted in a record drop in violence in Iraq.

"I don't think it's [Pakistan] lost. We still have enormous support in some ways in Pakistan ... the population is very much opposed to militancy in the main," he told ABC Radio's PM program.

"But I do think we do need to see a fairly wholesale change of heart coming from the Pakistani military before we're likely to see much difference on the ground."

Lieutenant Colonel Kilcullen, a former theorist of asymmetrical warfare in the Australian Army, says while the international focus has shifted from Iraq to Afghanistan, Pakistan is central to security concerns within in the region.

"I think it's not an exaggeration to say that Pakistan is the most dangerous country in the world today," he said.

"In certainly in terms of counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency problems, it is the problem that most worries me and I think that should most worry Western policy makers."

'Losing control'
He says the size of the country and its nuclear capabilities create a unique set of problems for Western countries.

"Pakistan is a very developed country, there's a Pakistani Diaspora across most other countries in Europe and North and South America and it has more than 100 nuclear weapons," he said.

"The government is progressively losing control of its own population and territory. And you've got Al Qaeda sitting right in the middle of the country so it's a very, very significant problem."

The counter-insurgency expert says the problems in Pakistan are compounded by a lack of direct access and diverging priorities within the Pakistani security agencies.

"We don't have a lot of ability to influence the situation in Pakistan and frankly there are elements in the Pakistani military and intelligence services who are on the other side," he said.

Labels: , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Grizzly works for me

We don't really do names that well, do we.

We all know the ship side of the house has sold its virtue and confused the rest ... and since the Tomcat, I don't think we have done well at all.

It can make for good blogg'n though; remember the poor EA-18G "Growler vs. Shocker" issue? Well, as expected, from the operational attitude that gave the A-10 "Warthog" - I think the pointy end has fixed the problem.
The Navy’s EA-18G Growler has a new name — at least on the radio.

The new electronic attack aircraft that joined the fleet last year will be known as a “Grizzly” on carrier decks worldwide.

The nickname “Growler” sounds too much like the EA-6B “Prowler,” its electronic attack predecessor, and the Navy wanted to avoid any confusion on flight decks.

“The names ‘Growler’ and ‘Prowler’ were too close to be safe,” said Kim Martin, a Navy spokeswoman at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Wash.

“ ‘Grizzly’ is a name that doesn’t sound like any other name,” she said.

The Boeing-made aircraft will continue on with Growler as its primary nickname. It will be known as a Grizzly only in operational situations.

The usage will be similar to the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornets’ operational moniker, the “Rhino.”
... and the Phibian nodd'd his head at peace.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Charles Johnson is right

Elvis Costello has a new alblum out (that is a collection of songs for the MP3 generation) - well worth the ponder.

When he isn't pounding creationists, the EuroFasctistFlirts, and the excitable parts of the American Right (along with Moonbats and IslamoFascist terrorists and their fellow travelers I might add) - his home at LGF always has good music recommendations.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

I am in full alignment with President Obama

Especially the sweatpants thing.


Obama Drastically Scales Back Goals For America After Visiting Denny's

Hat tip Allah.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Business Worst Practices

Does this sound familiar?
Now no one should be surprised that a service that suffered 40 years of nearly nonstop decline has arrived in its present condition. The signs were apparent for years even to the casual observer. Journalists, analysts, consultants, and, yes, even insiders with the temerity to buck the system pointed out that the Navy's shipbuilding program was flawed and that the service was playing itself to an inevitable endgame. It had too many Admirals demanding new design and specification changes, buzz-phrase laden trendy ideas-of-the-day, and executive attention to changing an image scarred by past problems with candor. It couldn't sell the handiwork of its outsize network of defense contractors and consultants. Unrealistic and unsustainable contracts made an affordable fleet all but impossible.

Why couldn't The Pentagon, Congress, and the CNO's Staff see what was coming? Blame a combination of hubris, myopia, and short-term thinking. During my 10 years of covering the Navy, I heard plenty of explanations from Navy insiders of why its business model couldn't be dismantled: It's too expensive to fight congress and industry lobbyists, so we shouldn't even try.
Apologies to David Welsh, but all I did was change a few descriptive nouns from his article in Der Spiegel on GM, A View from the Back Seat.

This is an exceptionally good article to help not just understand what happened to GM, but to get some insight into the myopia and tunnel vision that those at the top of very large and complex organizations can find themselves in. If you don't have the right people with the right vision - you find yourself painted in a corner that traditional ideas simply are not going to fix.
It is also an interesting look into common problems. In the article you will hear a few things like "group think," "retiree pensions and health care," and "underinvesting" that will have you nodd'n your nogg'n in understanding.

We all know that like GM, the Navy has some very good, very smart people trying their best to set priorities as they see them to fix a very hard problem. In that light, this should strike a chord,
What was frustratingly absent was the will among management and labor leaders to see what was coming and embrace real change before it was too late.
It isn't enough to have good and smart - you need good and smart combined with correct ideas and will to engage the sharp pointy things and ignore the distractions and the seduction of the short term feel good.

There reaches the point though that even if you have the right guys in the right places, without top cover and an overarching strategy that is feasible - you still find yourself sinking.
When former Chrysler star Lutz emerged from retirement in September 2001 to join the company as vice-chairman, it was common industry wisdom that GM's cars and trucks suffered from the corners that were cut on GM's product decisions by bean counters and manufacturing gurus.
...
Blame Wagoner if you want. But he inherited many of these problems and was making some of the right moves before he was fired. He couldn't get the company and those who depended on it to make enough sacrifices to get the job done. However, even an outsider like Bob Nardelli, a lauded cost-cutter who came to Chrysler after turns at General Electric and Home Depot, found few options in Detroit.
Here is a question; is there a parallel between the path of the USN over the last two decades and that of GM of the last four?

If the Navy version of the corporate bankruptcy is the final chapter of a story that leads to catastrophic loss at sea such as
The Battle of Midway or The Battle of Tsushima, then we can all agree that we are not yet at the final chapter.

Like GM in 2004 though, are we in the penultimate chapter, or are we still early on enough in the book to fix the cancer that is growing apace? Hard question.

One selfish note, if you did not catch the bold part of the first quote - I think that overlaps most of the "what use are bloggers" ven diagram. Methinks.

Labels: , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Bad form Ed

Yea Ed; you got your whale ... yippee.

For obvious reasons, this hits home. Publius of ObsidianWings isn't a "blog buddy" by any stretch, but he WAS an anonoblogger like me, for reasons like mine.

Well, Ed Whelan over at NRO decided because he didn't like him he would out him. Nasty business, and it is obvious that Ed does not understand what blogg'n is. It isn't reporting, it isn't journalism - it is blogg'n.

I'll let you read the details from the left and the right. There is ongoing commentary at The Corner as well that you can follow. Volokh here. Instapundit here, and Cap'n Ed at Hot Air here. Greyhawk is on target here.

I have watched the outing of other anonbloggers and know the type that like to out. With the exception of those who deserve outing, those who out normal anonobloggers are usually thin skinned, envy filled @55h@les who would rather destroy someone else than let their ideas succeed in the marketplace of ideas. The personality of outers are just a smidge close to trolls; same angry, bitter, dead-tree focused people. I don't think Ed is like that -- I just think he let Publius live rent free in his head too long.

Ed may have had some complaints, but they were petty and he let Publius get under his skin and to behave worse then the complaints he had about Publius. He did not understand the reasons for anonoblogg'n and the second and third level effects of the outing - people have their reasons. What an incredibly selfish act of intellectual vandalism outing is -- and I believe is in this case.

One thing about blogg'n is that it is fairly well self regulating. If you and your ideas are wrong or just plain boring, you don't get much readership. If your ideas or wrong or bad, they are discredited with more speech by others. The truth shows itself. Lies are proven lies by truth. Lies die.

When I started blogg'n, I made some mistakes and overreached in my anonymity - mostly out of not sourcing correctly, i.e. being lazy (too trusting and new at this sport in '04 'ya know). I apologized and deleted the posts and moved on mad at myself. Now days, there is nothing I post that I would hang my head in shame at. There are reasons to out a blogger though.

A blogger that intentionally and with known wrong information sets out to destroy someone, probably deserves to be outed. Same with a stalker. Someone that breaks OPSEC or other legal laws, sure, out them. Someone who makes and error, is given unquestionable evidence and refuses to make a correction in a troll like manner, probably. Besides that, outing just because you don't like the guys ideas or that he makes you uncomfortable with his criticism is just lame. Outing someone because you can't take the rough and tumble of the sharp elbowed marketplace of ideas (where people have a right to be wrong) is just lame ---- I think Ed is closer to this.

If you out though, be careful. You will draw fire on your own position.

Anonoblogg'n has a long tradition in our culture back to the pamphleteers and The Federalist Papers. No problem with it -- neither should anyone else who likes free speech.

Will I be anon forever? No; but as long as I wish not to provide a distraction for my Sailors and want to avoid bothering my ISIC; Buddhah willing I will be.

There will be a time and a place when I will break cover, but now is not that time. Hopefully it will be at a time and place of my choosing; sooner more than later. I think I have been fair enough to my critics that no one balanced will feel the need to throw a snit, but who knows. For every nasty email I get, I get 100 that are nice. For every nasty email I get about a post, I get 10 that "disagree without discord." I think my front porch doesn't get people all batty ... except for the Diversity Bullies, they are the nastiest.

Anyway, hopefully fate will allow me to come out at a time of my choosing. If not, bad on you.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Sunday Funnies

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

NAVSEA NAUSEA


Ever wonder why NAVSEA has its own tag at CDRSalamander?
The situation regarding which of NAVSEA's two SUPSHIP offices oversees the LCS is somewhat confusing. The Lockheed Martin team is building its ships at Marinette Marine, in Marinette, Wis., while the General Dynamics ships are built at Mobile, Ala. But the territorial demarcation lines are drawn on a rough north-south axis: the SUPSHIP office in Bath oversees the Mobile operations, while the SUPSHIP operation based in Pascagoula - about 40 miles from Mobile - is responsible for the Marinette operations.
You can't make this stuff up.

In the same article though is a great demonstration of what will make having a politician as SECNAV so much fun.
Levin had just finished remarking about the LCS program's cost growth. Although he did not mention that one of the first two ships had passed the $700 million mark, he questioned if the service can meet the $460 million cost cap imposed by Congress on the ships the Navy is asking for in 2010.

"Is there a realistic prospect that you'll be able to do it?" Levin asked.

"I think there's a realistic prospect we can strive toward that goal," replied Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who cited the lack of a cost escalation provision in the congressional spending limit on LCS, despite rising labor costs and inflation, which "have frankly made that less realistic."
Translation contest. The above quote - please translate into clear, taxpayer English.

Labels: , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Marty, you've got it wrong ...

Over at WaPo's "Leadership Page," Co-founder of the leadership-focused consulting firm, Cambridge Leadership Associates, and teacher at the Harvard Kennedy School, Marty Linsky (who also blogs at Linsky on Leadership), threw this bit out there,
The country is moving into new terrain with General Motors. This is a high risk experiment, and no one knows whether it will work. If GM was too big to fail before, the downside is even worse now.
No, we have been down this road before. Remember the promises, good intentions, and fudge that went into the Government Sponsored Enterprises Freddie and Fannie? They became, over time, nothing but a patronage op - giving millions to political insiders who didn't know squat about mortgages. They became nothing but political.

I have trouble that Marty cannot make the connection when he smells it all over the place.
The danger is that GM will be politicized and become part of the pulling, hauling and horse trading that happens among all of the issues facing the country. The federal government now has a conflict of interest. As a dominant shareholder, there is a huge stake in a quick turnaround. But there are also compelling and competing stakes in other issues, like labor contracts, environmental concerns and international trade relations.

If the administration really means what it says, it will put the best possible people in key roles, protect GM from the pressures inside the Beltway to micromanage its operations and expose it to the pressures of the consumer marketplace and Wall Street.

Obama will have a tough time keeping his "hands-off" commitment when good business decisions come crashing into favorite policy positions. He's already succumbed to some of those pressures: naming an insider as CEO, giving the unions a big ownership role and decreeing what kind of cars GM must build, commercially viable or not.
This will not end well for anyone but those in gov'munt who are able to get an ego boost from power, or a bonus check for trying.

... or maybe they cold be smart and hire smart, well meaning people from such places like ... ohhhh .... I don't know; Cambridge Leadership Associates? What do you think Marty?

Yes, more Harvard Leadership is exactly what this nation needs. After all, they formed such a core of the banking and investment industry in NYC - with that resume filler - they must be the one.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

When war had a soundtrack

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Anti-piracy parallel universe

I think all of us would nod our heads to the usual clear-headed Danish response to piracy.
Danish group Shipcraft said putting armed guards on its vessels travelling through the Gulf of Aden was a deterrent and also a means of protecting its crews despite the risks involved.

"They (pirates) do not like to be there when the guards are there," said Shipcraft's chief executive Per Nykjaer Jensen.

"As long as the politicians don't make up their minds, then we have to act ourselves," he told Reuters.
I did say "clear-headed," didn't I?

Well - get out the woolies.
The debate over whether to allow armed guards on vessels has gathered momentum and the U.N.'s shipping agency, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), has taken it up.

Peter Hinchliffe, marine director with industry association the International Chamber of Shipping, told an IMO meeting on piracy last week there were concerns over the "proliferating private armies of security guards", who were also unregulated.

"These relate to issues of legality and liability for the use of lethal force, collateral damage and shipboard safety," he said.

"There is a danger that the carriage of armed guards in merchant ships may lead to an arms race with criminal pirate gangs who may be able to obtain ever more potent fire power."

What bureaucratic comfy-chair laden parallel universe does this guy come from?

As usual, we have the weak blaming the strong for taking action and blaming others for their own lack of performance in their job. The last part is the same mentality we saw with the SANE/FREEZE gaggle during the Cold War. That type of mentality was wrong in the '30s and the Cold War - and it is wrong now.

I hope Peter drinks.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Fullbore Friday


When it comes to the A-1H Skyraider vs. Mig-17s, most are familiar with the first one as covered in the videos below. There was a second one though - one that involved the pilot we discussed in one of last month's FbF and pictured in the pic on the right, Lt. Pete Russell on the right, with LtJg. Tom Patton on the left as they discuss,
LCDR Leo Cook and his wingman LTJG Wiley were the lead section of Skyraiders working to locate and hopefully rescue a downed US pilot in North Vietnam. While maneuvering at low altitude between ridges and cloud layers, they were jumped by what turned out to be two sections of MiG 17s. Calling out the attack on their common radio frequency, Cook and Wiley fought for their lives. LT Pete Russell and LTJG Tom Patton soon arrived in the area and immediately gained a position of advantage on the MiGs. The details of this encounter were taped by the intelligence officer on board the Intrepid after the incident.
The key is to go to this page and listen to that interview. That is Fullbore.



Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

... and they vote

Mrs. Salamander reminds me why my hair is falling out.
On May 21, a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed a complaint filed by a woman who said she had purchased "Cap'n Crunch with Crunchberries" because she believed "crunchberries" were real fruit. The plaintiff, Janine Sugawara, alleged that she had only recently learned to her dismay that said "berries" were in fact simply brightly-colored cereal balls, and that although the product did contain some strawberry fruit concentrate, it was not otherwise redeemed by fruit. She sued, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated consumers who also apparently believed that there are fields somewhere in our land thronged by crunchberry bushes.

According to the complaint, Sugawara and other consumers were misled not only by the use of the word "berries" in the name, but also by the front of the box, which features the product's namesake, Cap'n Crunch, aggressively "thrusting a spoonful of 'Crunchberries' at the prospective buyer."

|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Why my readers rule II: Electric Boogaloo

Working off yesterday's post --- here are the rather selections from the music side of the house. Again, nothing huge or shocking, but an eclectic mix. I think it was E40 or OMC going after all that EuroPop stuff with the umlauts.



.... and for your listening pleasure ...

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Waiting for the end of DADT

Like I have said, the only thing that gives me pause for allowing Sailors of all adult-to-adult predictions to serve without fear is .... well .... what teh Diversity Bullies will do with it.
I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. I call upon the people of the United States to turn back discrimination and prejudice everywhere it exists.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.
Like the wording? WWTJD?

Getting rid of DADT to "Don't Care" would be smooth if it wasn't going to be shoved in everyone's face a la Eminim & Bruno ----- but we all know what teh Diversity Industry in the Navy would do. See the above to get a look.

Anyway it isn't fair that Sulu gets two months back to back - not that there is anything wrong with that.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Diversity Thursday

Once again, no commentary is needed on my part. Quod erat demonstrandum.

BEHOLD the field of butchered integrity smeared with the gore of all that is unclean.
-----Original Message-----
From: [redacted], John C CTR [redacted], [redacted] [mailto:john.[redacted].ctr@navy.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:35 PM
To: [redacted], Robert LCDR [redacted]; [redacted], Paul S LCDR [redacted], Chaplain; [redacted], Mary J. [redacted] (USS [redacted]);
Subject: FW: Women of Color Nominations
Importance: High


Here is an award opportunity that was previously sent out to the entire Tactical Diversity Team. As of today, not one single award package has been submitted by the Navy. The deadline has been extended until 8 May 09. This is a golden opportunity to recognize your outstanding female Sailors.

Please send award nomination directly to Richard [redacted] at [redacted]@ccgmag.com. Please cc: Lt Enjoli [redacted] at enjoli.[redacted]@navy.mil, Ms Laura [redacted] at laura.m.[redacted]@navy.mil and Mr. John [redacted] at john.[redacted].ctr@navy.mil. Thanks.

John


John [redacted]
NAE Diversity Awareness Practitioner
Commander, [redacted]
(Local) 619-545-[redacted]
DSN 735-[redacted]


-----Original Message-----
From: [redacted], E [redacted] M LT
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 13:14
To: [redacted], Enjoli M LT
Subject: FW: Women of Color Nominations
Importance: High

Diversity Leaders,

I just received this e-mail from Richard [redacted]. As you can see, he has not received any Navy nominations for the National Women of Color Awards. I have not received any nominations either. I will ask him to extend the deadline for the conference awards to 8 May. Please forward this e-mail to your commands and encourage them to submit nominations. This is an extremely important award for the Navy (similar to BEYA), and we have Navy personnel who are deserving of these awards. Please let me know if you have any questions.

V/R,
LT E [redacted] [redacted]
Navy Diversity Directorate ([redacted])
(703) 614-[redacted]
enjoli.[redacted]@navy.mil www.npc.navy.mil/CommandSupport/Diversity

We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
- Anaïs Nin

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard [redacted] [mailto:[redacted]@ccgmag.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 16:02
To: [redacted], E [redacted] M LT
Cc: [redacted], Matthew R LCDR NAVPERSCOM [redacted]; [redacted], Lori L CDR CNP [redacted]
Subject: Women of Color Nominations

E [redacted],

I wanted to reach to you regarding the 2009 WOC Nominations from the Navy.

Just to update the category awards deadline is May 1st.

We have not received any nominations so far. If additional time is required, I can extend the deadline for category awards until Friday May 8th.

The Rising Star and All Star awards are due May 15th. All that is necessary for these nominees are photo and bio. So far I have not receive any.

I have received a recommendation letter from Captain Lee R. [redacted], Jr for Sharon [redacted] in the category of Community Service.

Please let me know if I could be of service.

V/R

Richard [redacted]
"Diversity Communications Consultant"
Career Communications Group, Inc.
410/244-[redacted] ext:[redacted]
www.ccgmag.com[redacted]@ccgmag.com

Two-fer bigotry. Big Navy wants us to discriminate on the basis of both race and sex. What leadership!

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Why you don't give up the ship without a fight

I don't care what excuse you make - go to the 0:50 mark and watch how institutional cowardice gives your enemies strength.

The Royal Navy helping the President of Iran get elected? Sure, why not.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

LCS bites man

...or "Dog Bites Man" or "Water is Wet," take your choice.
The estimated cost of the first of the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships rose a modest $6 million over the past year, but the price tag to complete the second LCS jumped $68 million, putting the ship over the $700 million mark, Pentagon budget documents show.

The price to build, outfit and deliver the Freedom (LCS 1) now is $637 million, up from last year’s estimate of $631 million. The ship was delivered to the Navy last September and commissioned in November, but the service and shipbuilder Lockheed Martin will continue to complete the warship well into 2009, as intended.
The price tag for the Independence (LCS 2), however, is pegged by the Navy at $704 million, up from last year’s mark of $636 million. The ship is still under construction at Austal USA in Mobile, Ala., under subcontract from General Dynamics. Initial sea trials are expected to take place this summer, with delivery scheduled for later this year.
...and yes Virginia, that does not include even one Mission Module.

BTW, who has been held accountable for this dog's breakfast?
Started at $220 Million

The price tag for each LCS has been a key element of the program since 2004, when the Navy said each of the ships was to cost $220 million —
...
The Navy revealed in early 2007 that cost had ballooned on each of the competing ship designs. Prior to accounting for those cost growths, the service at that time reckoned the cost for LCS 1 at $293 million and for LCS 2 at $297 million — figures that more than doubled a year later.
Of course, Salamander readers have known this from the start.

One other note given the near to mid-term budget realities; The Nile must be a tributary of the Potomac.
“The Navy is not planning on downselecting,” Sean Stackley, the Navy’s top weapon buyer, told reporters May 15. “We’ve got a competition going on right now for three ships in 2010. We’re using all the tools we have in our tool kit to figure out how far we can bring these costs down.”

But Stackley refused to say what the Navy’s cost goals are on LCS, other than to cite a congressionally mandated cost cap of $460 million per ship.
Lots of chickens starting to roost on the Navy henhouse. Lots.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Why my readers rule

Via Amazon, I have a way to track what books, DVDs etc my readers have bought after leaving cdrsalamander to browse at Amazon. The funny thing is that most of what was bought was not what I linked to.

Just for the month of may, here are some of the titles you, my readers, purchased - many more than one of some of the tiles, all from more than one reader. That isn't all the links that were followed - and isn't all that much - I just thought it was neat.


Neat-o. I like your taste, and to be honest, looking at what you read reinforces the wee bit of pride I have in the fellowship here. Just to show off, here is the list in a format like you see in my side-bars - to save you the trouble of checking them out if you wish.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

New SPRU review ...

Another keel with a great name and a great hull number. DDG-111, the latest BIW Arleigh Burke.



Hat tip NAVSEA Spy.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

The peasants revolt ...

Sure, even though they still have bad teeth like days of old, now days they drive Mini's, Vauxhalls, and have the cool looking cabs and all ... but still ... this should be fun.

The SNP and Plaid Cymru are tabling a Commons motion to dissolve Parliament and cause an immediate general election next week.

The Liberal Democrats have signalled that they intend to back it and now William Hague has said that the Conservatives too would troop through the lobbies in favour of such a motion as well:

"If that was debated in Parliament… certainly we’d be in favour of the dissolution of Parliament."

It was only a few weeks ago that the Government suffered that shock defeat on a minority party motion in the Commons, when the Lib Dems tabled the motion on settlement rights for the Gurkhas.

So in order to avoid a general election, the Labour whips will have to ensure a full turnout from Labour MPs when the vote takes place on this motion next Wednesday. Given that the Labour Party has a Commons majority still in the high fifities (after recent suspensions from the PLP), it seems unthinkable that the Government could lose such a vote.

But would any Labour MPs abstain or even rebel to help put this administration out of its misery?
Thing is, there will be no easy fix for what Labour has done to the UK - from devolution to debt .... and the fix will be exceptionally painful, but it will be easy compared to eight years of President Spendalot.

Maybe Britain isn't quite dead yet.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Horse soldiers on the way ...

Remember the lament that went out from here in JAN 05?
It has been a concern of mine for awhile that Hollywierd has not made any effort to tell the story of this Global War. From early on there have been many opportunities, heck the cavalry charge in the start of the Afghanistan operation would make a great movie.
...and again in JUL 05?
Hollywierd continues to demonstrate its hate of America as we are almost 4 yrs post-9/11 and there have been NO major efforts to make a film of any substance about the war from a major movie house. The mounted cavalry charge with B-52s early on in OEF, I though would be a no-brainer. I was there for the planning. I have inside (very funny) UNCLAS info for them direct from C5F briefings about saddles, horses, etc. Email me. Make a movie. Funny, inspiring, motivation, patriotic. Did I mention it had a cavalry charge by US Soldiers? Rumors from 2002 ... then ... nothing. Sigh. Sometimes.....
Well hot, fracking d@mn.
Doug Stanton's upcoming book Horse Soldiers is coming to the big screen at the hands of uber-producer Jerry Bruckheimer and Disney, which just recently acquired the screen rights. The story revolves around a band of elite Special Forces and CIA operatives who secretly invaded Afghanistan post-9/11 on horseback and helped Afghan fighters capture the city of Mazar-i-Sharif and topple the Taliban. In Horse Soldiers, the operatives helped orchestrate the invasion by bribing local warlords and using high-tech communications to coordinate the assault and equip the Afghan soldiers. They also held off an ambush during the surrender of hundreds of Taliban troops. Scribner will publish the book in May. Stanton previously wrote In Harm's Way, the story of the sinking of the USS Indianapolis during WWII. Warner Bros. was at one point developing a big screen adaptation. Bruckheimer has G-Force and Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time on the horizon
Oh Shipmate ... don't be a tool. You know the book is always better than the movie.

The book is out and ready. Horse Soldiers: The Extraordinary Story of a Band of US Soldiers Who Rode to Victory in Afghanistan.



Hat tip Dennis.

Labels: , , ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

We almost went to war for this?


One way to wake up an old Cold Warrior is to mention one location - the Kola Peninsula.

In MoscowTopNews is yet another photo spread of what was once one of the most important bits of real estate in the world - one that people were willing to die for to get pictures out of.

Sad in a way - but so is much of that former empire.

Take some time (watch for the "more" tag if you find an area of interest) - abandoned bones of the empire here, here, here, and here.

If you like scary stories - read this.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Headed the way of the Talosians?

World population will hit 7 billion by 2012, according to a recent United Nations report. Given that we just hit the 6 billion mark in October 1999, it is easy to conclude that there are just too many people in the world. How are we ever going to overcome global warming, feed the masses, get that beachfront property, let alone find parking, if the population keeps jumping by nearly one billion per decade?

The good news is that's not going to happen again. If you need another megatrend to worry about, fixate instead on the growing prospects for world depopulation and what it means for you and your children (assuming you have any).

Yes, human population is still growing in some places dramatically so. But at the same time, a strange new phenomenon is spreading around the globe, one whose very existence contradicts the deepest foundations of our modern mind-set.

Darwinism presupposes, and modern biology teaches, that all organisms breed to the limit of their available resources. Yet starting in the world's richest, best-fed nations during the 1970s,and now spreading throughout the developing world, we find birthrates falling below the levels needed to avoid long-term, and in many instances, short-term, population loss. The phenomenon has spread beyond Europe and Asia to Latin America.
The Talosians were petering out too .... though understandable as I didn't see many women and who would mate with them anyway?

Good news? More places to hunt!

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

So, did you like 28 Days Later

And 28 Weeks Later? Then this will get your attention.
A highly infectious strain of mutant rabies is spreading among animals across the state of Arizona, says National Geographic News. The new strain probably first appeared in bats before it spread to skunks and foxes in the area. The frightening thing about this mutant virus is the way it is communicated, say officials at the Centers for Disease Control. Unlike most rabies strains, it’s not carried from animal to animal through bites. Instead, it is spread through close social contact, like the common cold or flu. At this point, the transfer of mutant rabies from animals to humans “should be a major concern,” says molecular virologist Hinh Ly. Fearful that infection could get to humans by contact between pets and such wide-ranging wild animals as the fox, officials in the city of Flagstaff have issued a 90-day pet quarantine.
...and you thought the flu had normal people wearing useless masks in public.

|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

The change in AFG

This started out as a much longer post - but I have decided to just boil this down to the basics without a bunch of the usual commentary.

I have been saying, rightly, that all the things happening in AFG right now are not "new" - that they are the results of what has been in the work for well over a year. That is true. That is no longer going to the the case though.

Gen. McKiernan's firing should signal one thing to all - the USA (and because it has not choice, NATO) is going to change radically what it does in AFG sooner more than later. You won't see the changes on the ground for at least 6 months, but they are coming.

The ground truth for the why and how Gen. McKiernan was fired will come out at some time, I don't want to add to the speculation about it. That is looking backwards, I want to talk about forward.

I want you to focus on two open source reports that I believe will shine some light on where we are going. First for Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff;
Mullen said additional forces and new tactics can help the United States turn a discouraging tide in Afghanistan. He said he was hopeful that "in the next 12- to 24 months, that we can stem the trends which have been going very badly in Afghanistan the last three years."
There may be a bit of circular reporting on this, but the 24-month mark is starting to creep more and more into the picture.

Second, is this little window into McKiernan's firing;
Unidentified Pentagon officials and fellow officers were quoted today saying McKiernan was too conventional in his thinking, that he had tried (and failed) to force out the allegedly corrupt Afghan president Hamid Karzai, and that as Nato commander he was too chummy with the mostly flaky European allies. In this latter respect, this week's developments mark another stage in the "re-Americanisation" of the Afghan war.

The problem is, the charges against McKiernan don't stick. In a media briefing last autumn, shortly after taking command, McKiernan set out a clear, thought-through, and politically subtle strategy. More troops were needed, especially in the south, after years of neglect due to Iraq. But reinforcements alone were not the answer.

"We can win all the tactical battles but that doesn't mean we win. To win, we have to win the battle of ideas," he said. "We must define winning in Afghan terms: meaning improved security, reduced civilian casualties, trustworthy government, economic and social progress."
Bingo. Those familiar with the plan in AFG know that there was little conventional or excessively kinetic about the plan. It was about as comprehensive and integrated as you can get.

What we may want to look at here is a bit of strategic impatience. NATO is slow. Working with the international community is slow. If you driven by a calendar-based plan instead of a conditions-based plan, then you do not have time to talk with your Global Partners; you just do what you want and let a "Coalition of the Willing" catch up to you when they can.

In a great irony, it looks like the Obama Administration if totally repudiating not the Bush Doctrine, but he Kerry Doctrine. Sound like they want out soon, not out right. A valid opinion, but one that will not likely be a success in the long run. If they sacked McKiernan because he was too interested in working with our Allies and the international community than was the new Administration's taste - then all those on the foreign policy Left need to take a powder - you just became a charactiture of the Bush protest puppets you built in mid-decade.


Allies and friends be damned. We are doing it our way. Is that the new line in Afghanistan? Funny, but there it is.

The one hope we have is that LTG McChrystal and Rodriguez can convince the new Administration to go condition-based vice calendar based. If we are going to be calendar based, then to be blunt, we might as well leave this year before the passes freeze over. AFG cannot be fixed or won in 24 months. This is at least a 10 year project - as it will take 10 years to build momentum towards a more literate society with the 8 year old whose behind is in his school seat.

Let's hope this change isn't towards the calendar based approach. If it is, we'll be back.

Labels: ,


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Another future Sailor ....


He can join our wardroom anytime; but he will be the Admin Queen for most of deployment - mostly because I think he will do a great job. Skippy, whatchathink?
A teenager decided to give his parents a nice surprise by painting a 60ft-long penis on the new roof of their £1million house.

Inspired by watching a documentary on Google Earth, 18-year-old Rory McInnes decided to give aerial observers an eyeful, with the aid of a tin of white paint.

The new flat roof of Andy and Clare McInnes' house in Hungerford, Berkshire, had recently been completed by builders. Painting the enormous member took Rory only half an hour.

There it lurked for around twelve months, until a passing helicopter pilot spotted it, and let his passengers take photos. Fortunately for Rory, he was safely on the other side of the world when his parents found out, on a gap-year in Brazil.
AW1 - I think you know what sons like that are, don't 'cha - I think they become OS's or Army types?

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious

Combine it with Fleet Week, and perfection!


You know I am a big fan of the Balts - Estonians mostly - but the whole bunch in general.

Now, even more so.
Several hundred blondes marched through the Latvian capital Riga Sunday in a bid cheer up the crisis-hit Baltic nation, suffering the worst recession in the 27-member EU.

Led by an orchestra, the first-ever blond parade featured women dressed in pink and white, some accompanied by lapdogs, in a charity fund-raising event that organisers hope will become an annual event.

"I'm not stupid. I'm beautiful and I'll prove it," blonde participant high school student Ilona Zigure told AFP.

Organisers said they were determined to bring positive energy to their country, expected to see its economy contract by 16 percent this year.

The parade is part of the what they are calling Blonde Weekend, which will also features a blonde golf tournament, a little lady fashion show, an evening ball, and a children's drawing competition.

"It's a great time to spend in the parade and contribute to a charity," said Ieva, one blonde spectator.

"Finally something different, something positive because I'm tired of hearing about the crisis," said another, 70-year old Ausma.

The event attracted many locals and puzzled tourists.

Following the parade, blondes climbed into open-topped cars and drove to the local shopping centre to go shopping.

The money collected during the event will be donated to support children's safety and playgrounds for disabled children in Riga and across Latvia.

The organisers want to make May 31 official Blondes' Day in Latvia.

Latvia, a small Baltic nation with the population of 2.3 million people has been going through the deepest recession in the European Union, which it joined in 2004.
When you look at what the Baltic Republics have been through in living memory - you can see that a 'lil recession isn't really all that worth getting worked up over.

And yes, this video is required. Ahem.

Labels:


|

Digg! Digg It! del.ic.ious This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?