Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Proactively “From the Sea”; an agent of change leveraging the littoral best practices for a paradigm breaking six-sigma best business case to synergize a consistent design in the global commons, rightsizing the core values supporting our mission statement via the 5-vector model through cultural diversity.
Well the upUS Navy stopped using Lead Base Oaint in 1996, which would have made Cdr. Michael William Brannon, USN the first of the post 1996 Rust Navy Commanding Officers or Cdr. Charles Ferguson...
CDR Salamander: We Need a Material Condition Standdown · 3 months ago
How about for the period actually under discussion in the article? When that picture was taken. I'm guessing the ship didn't look like that when it came out of the builder's yard, so maybe that guy...
CDR Salamander: We Need a Material Condition Standdown · 3 months ago
For what timeframe! USS Fort McHenry had twenty-four CO’s from 8 August 1987 to 27 March 2021! The last being Cdr. Michael J. Fabrizio, which last known whereabouts was in Mayport, Florida of the...
CDR Salamander: We Need a Material Condition Standdown · 3 months ago
All these years later, I'm curious--does anyone know where the then CO ended up? Retire at 3-star or something?
CDR Salamander: We Need a Material Condition Standdown · 3 months ago
The detailed breakdown of NATO's shifts in policy and military posture provides a lot of food for thought. speedy...
CDR Salamander: NATO's Evolution in Response to the Russo-Ukrainian War with Jorge Benitez - on Midrats · 9 months ago
7 comments:
Hahahaha. Brilliant comparison between journalists and the dog waiting for cheese toast. :-D
A few of the officers were discussing the RS article. M4 is too smart to not realize this would get out. The concurrence is that this was planned as an excuse to jump ship before it sinks. Afghanistan is a complete and utter failure...and McChrystal knows this. Better to get fired for outlandish remarks then for losing the war...instead of being the General Who Lost the War, he will be just a few chapters in that book. Smart move to get out of this quagmire...
Excellant.
Maybe the General is too smart for this to happen accidentally. Maybe not. Recent history is replete with examples of people whom we mistakedly assume are "really smart" based on supremely well filled out academic records and resumes turning out to be "not smart at all." See the bankers on Wall Street, those brilliant Ivy Leaguers who couldn't figure out how to keep going concerns running without being bailed out. The list goes on and on. Most people are average, even those who rise to the highest positions.
Thankfully the General in charge of this abysmal effort is gone. Unfortunately the wrongheaded policy will remain in effect. Afghanistan, its government and people are tangential to the overall fight against terrorists. We are likely to lose in Afghanistan, but even success would bring little value relative to cost. This fight should be led by the CIA, not DoD. We need to hunt terrorists the world over and kill them, not build a stable Afghanistan. We need to eliminate the threat, which is the terrorist, and we need to do it by killing them, period. Get conventional troops out of Afghanistan, put the CIA in charge, chop special forcers to the CIA, hunt terrorists without regard to borders, kill them, repeat as often as necessary. I guess "the only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history" (Friedrich Hegel).
So who's taking over as CENTCOM? Petraus is very, very good but that's too big a dual hatted role for anyone. Plus being one's own boss isn't the smartest thing if you ask.
That's a good piece, CDR. I've seen your links to USNI before, but never followed one because I assumed it was going to be a more technical site that wouldn't interest me. When I followed URR's link from the other McChrytal post, I liked it a lot. I'll definitely bookmark the site.
Post a Comment