Reagan on Obamacare

In 1961, all you need to know about Obamacare was covered by The Gipper.



Hat tip Drudge.

BTW, when you read about Obamacare - does this scene come to mind?

Paging all 1800s ....

Time to buy a boat?

PIE UA /OV PIE 360055/TM 1437/FL350/TP MD88/TA -43/IC LGT RIME/RM ZJX CWSU

Hat tip Sid.

Fullbore Friday

Sailor Daniel Galvin honors his Shipmates from the USS Quincy (CA-39).



Nothing I can say here is up to that.

A broader view from CDR Bullard at USNIBlog and me here.

Phib, why did you start blogg'n?

Well, a big reason was the self-appointed gatekeepers of knowledge that seems to believe in only one thing more their own greatness; that they must c0ckbl0ck the generation of ideas and the freeflow of opinion that didn't start with them or support their own ideas.

In a classic case of a pompous a55 just not getting it at all - check out Loren B. Thompson's rant pi55ing all over the Milblog world, one that he is very late joining.

Lexington Launches A Different Kind Of Defense Blog

Greetings from New England. Yes, I too am at the beach. But I'm still working, and the purpose of this brief is to tell you about a new project that the Lexington Institute has launched while you were away. It is a defense blog. Yes, yes, I know -- there are already hundreds of defense blogs, and many of them are pretty awful. But that's why we launched our own blog on the Lexington homepage, called Early Warning. It isn't awful. In fact, I'm betting that if you read a few entries, at some point you'll say -- "Gee, I didn't know that."

We all recognize what the main problem is with blogs. The barriers to entry are so low that almost anyone with a laptop can start one, and it's hard to sort out the good ones from tendentious nonsense. For every interesting, competent effort like DoD Buzz, there are dozens of ill-mannered rants masquerading as insight. To say that blogs have lowered the standards of public discourse on policy matters is an under-statement -- there are no standards. Anybody can say anything, with extra points for verbosity.

We are trying a different approach. First, we intend to keep our postings brief. It will be a rare day indeed that a posting on Early Warning runs as long as this brief, and the typical posting will run to two or three paragraphs. Second, we plan to be long on facts -- especially little known, useful facts -- and short on opinions. I mean really, why should you care what I think about the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle or V-22 tiltrotor unless I have inside information to impart? And third, we intend to write about national security in a somewhat more expansive manner than most military analysts. We will frequently look beyond the realm of strategy and tactics, to dissect economic trends, political developments and technology breakthroughs that have a material bearing on national security.

Obviously, we do not expect this vision of a world-class web-log to spring spontaneously from the collective consciousness of the Lexington braintrust onto the Internet. It will take some time to get the blog right, including all the material that surrounds it at www.lexingtoninstitute.org. The blog has actually been up and running for over two weeks, and we are still tweaking features such as how the postings display and are written. But we think we're off to a good start, and are already getting indications that people in the defense community have noticed.

We want Early Warning to be an island of sanity in the chaos of the Worldwide Web. With so many traditional news outlets declining and no new hierarchy of credible sources yet emerged, we'd like to offer a site that is both sensible and engaging. We will never match the resources of the New York Times or the reach of the Associated Press. But we hope that when you read something on the Lexington blog and say, "Gee, I didn't know that," it will be because the information is new and not because it is wrong.

So, he wants us to know he has enough money to spend his summers at the beach, he alone can bring the intelligence to the MilBlog world, and that no one has ever found something new in the MilBlog world until he showed up.

Someone buy Loren a book on networking. Rule 1: don't insult everyone in the network you want to join.

Let the marketplace of ideas speak for itself, but if he thinks his blog is covering anything new, then he isn't reading blogs.

And yes, you will notice that I don't hyperlink to his site - I almost didn't even post on this. Why bother, you can't even comment there on his posts. I guess if it is on his blog, then everything has been said that needs to be said.

---

UPDATE: If you don't know who Loren is per se: David Axe at WarIsBoring completes the bold-faced items nicely.

Diversity Thursday

Today, let's just have a nice laugh at the Diversity Bullies. We'll start with the pic below, but you need to go to 11 Points for the rest.



Hat tip LBG.

Phib agree with Zinni?

Most of you know that Gen. Zinni is a retired General Officer that I don't find myself wanting to reference often, for reasons I have no desire to go into here.

If you listen to the first 3:45 of the clip below from the WaPo, critically, you might get an idea why, but that isn't really what I want you to do.

Go to the 3:45 point and listen to what he has to say about loyalty. He is spot on.

He puts out in that 1:15 what I have been trying, in fits and starts, to get across for the last 5+ years.

Wh0ring out your daughter

As a father of girls "of a certain age" - I have to deal with all things Miley Cyrus.

So, once again, thanks to the dysfunctional Cyrus family I have had another teaching moment.

As a society, we cannot complain about our children's lack of a childhood, STDs and pregnancy among the very young, ped0phi1ia and kiddpr0n and everything else that goes along with it when we sexualize our young at such an early age .... and especially those younger kids look up to.

What we have here is something that is much different than we had with the younger Spears girl that was two kids making the mistakes clueless kids have been making for thousands of years.

No, this is all about the adults. From her parents to her agent and all involved in the production.

Hollywood will turn you into a wh0re. I come back again to Patrick Swayze who once said something to the effect, "This town will turn anyone into a whore if you let them."

Sad in so many ways. Classic case of a few willing to sell their soul for money now.

The kids are alright - it is the adults who are sick. I'm with the girl on the right; her facial expression says it all.

My eldest calls those "booty shorts." We called them Daisy Dukes ... and yes, I see 12yr old girls with them all the time. That doesn't mean it is good for the girls or the culture - some may think it is not big deal, but I guess that is one opinion from those who probably don't have kids. Watch the below and tell me if you want your children to do that in front of millions of adult men.

My girls are not impressed. That, of course, makes me proud of them - today they both of them said they like Selena Gomez better anyway. Good girls.