Tuesday, September 08, 2015

Black Swan Tuesday: Return to Constantinople

As history shows, more often than not you don't get the war you expect on the timetable you want. Sometimes it comes to your door quickly via a strange route. In hindsight, all the dots seem to connect - but when you are in it real-time, it is much harder to see.

We also know that the war you were planning for does show up, but it quickly evolves in to something completely different in either location, alliance arrangements, or scale.

Sometimes on Tuesday, I like to bring out little vignettes from by little flock of Black Swans. When a couple variations of the entering arguments come up in my news feed I figure, why not throw it out there.

What Black Swan came out of the bag this week? In a very short period of time, Russia could destroy NATO and dismember Turkey by taking all of European Turkey including the Dardanelles, and most of northwest Turkey from a line running roughly from Zonguldak on the Black Sea Coast, through Bozüyük in the interior to Izmir on the Aegean Sea. 

This all happens rather quickly, as at the same time, most of eastern and southeastern Turkey falls under the control of the Kurds.

When the combatants come at last to the table in Beijing, the Turkish Republic has shrunk to almost 40% of its pre-war size. The call for a peace conference comes following a military coup and civil war between the humiliated remnants of the Turkish military and the discredited Islamic fundamentalists of the civilian government. 

Millions of ethnic Turks are starving as they flee the Russians in the northwest, and in the south from Russians and their Syrian allies. The Kurds in the southeast are pushing ethnic Turks to the closed Georgian and Armenian borders in the east.

The Turkish Mediterranean coast is teeming with refugee camps with no external outlet. Tightly sealed Europe is already in disarray from previous refugee waves. Off the coast, a Greek and Cypriot maritime units in partnership with Russia in the Aegean keep the Turks ashore. Further at sea, tight patrols by the Israeli and Italian navies to keep all refugee boats bottled in except for those bringing Turks out of Cyprus escaping that renewed conflict there full of "little green men." The scene outside British bases in Cyprus is one out of a horror movie.

The Baltic republics, Scandinavian nations, and the former Warsaw Pact nations of Central and Eastern Europe are playing diplomatic catch-up to find a new accommodation with Russia, as it becomes clear that NATO is no longer a true alliance.

Let's see what signals came up through the ambient noise this week that triggered this Black Swan.

We know about the Russians:
Russia is building a military base in Syrian president Bashar al-Assad’s heartland, according to American intelligence officials, in the clearest indication yet of deepening Russian support for the embattled regime of Bashar al-Assad.

The anonymous officials say Russia has set up an air traffic control tower and transported prefabricated housing units for up to 1,000 personnel to an airfield serving the Syrian port city of Latakia.

Russia has also requested the rights to fly over neighbouring countries with military cargo aircraft during September, according to the reports.

The claims, which will raise fears that Russia is planning to expand its role in the country’s civil war, will ratchet up tensions between Moscow and Washington over the future of Syria and its brutal ruler.
With enough political problems at home and a souring attitude towards its European powers, from the department of tone deafness, it seems like we want to put pressure on Greece;
The Greek Foreign Ministry has confirmed receipt of a request from Washington, asking that Russia be denied use of Greek airspace for aid flights to Syria, Reuters reported.

The announcement came from the Greek Foreign Ministry spokesman, who added the US request was being considered.

On Sunday, a diplomatic source in Athens told RIA Novosti that Greece had refused to close its airspace to Russian planes carrying humanitarian aid to Syria.
In an unrelated side-note, don't ask me to explain our policy towards Syria. I seriously do not think we have one. We are just making things up as we go along.

OK, how are the Kurds doing?
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has pledged to "wipe out" Kurdish PKK rebels in their strongholds after a deadly bomb attack on the Turkish army.

"The mountains of this country, the plains, highlands, cities will be not abandoned to terrorists," he said.

At least 16 Turkish soldiers died in Sunday's attack in the south-eastern Hakkari province, the army said.

In retaliation, Turkey carried out several air strikes on PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) targets on Monday.

Speaking at a news conference on Monday, Mr Davutoglu said: "You cannot discourage us from our war on terror. Those mountains will be cleared of these terrorists. Whatever it takes, they will be cleared."

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan earlier said he was saddened by the attack and promised a "decisive" response.
"The pain of our security forces who were martyred in the treacherous attack by the separatist terrorist organisation sears our hearts," he said.
How does this all play together?

1. It is clear that Europe and the USA are not going to do anything serious in Syria.
2. Assad's Syria is not just an Iranian proxy, but a Russian one as well. Iran has been emboldened by Western weakness, and so has Russia. They have the wind at their back. They also cannot afford internally to have a loss.
3. The West is being turned against itself due to the flood of refugees from the Middle East. This is good for Russia.
4. For personal and national reasons, Russia wants NATO gone.
The commander of the US army in Europe has spoken out in support of the military relationship with Britain, amid concerns it could be damaged by defence cuts.
“The US-UK relationship is as important as ever,” Lt-Gen Frederick “Ben” Hodges said. “The UK is our oldest ally and still a leader in Nato. I think the UK will live up to its leadership position.”

He accused Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, of seeking to destroy Nato, and warned that Russia could seek to use the sort of “hybrid warfare” seen in eastern Ukraine against a Nato member to test the alliance.

“I am sure Putin wants to destroy our alliance, not by attacking it but by splintering it,” he said in a speech to military and political leaders in Berlin.
5. Forget ancient history of Rome-Constantinople-Moscow mythology or the Fatima Prophecy if you are looking for larger national reasons why Moscow would move on Istanbul; look just a century ago;
Constantinople Agreement, (March 18, 1915), secret World War I agreement between Russia, Britain, and France for the postwar partition of the Ottoman Empire. It promised to satisfy Russia’s long-standing designs on the Turkish Straits by giving Russia Constantinople (Istanbul), together with a portion of the hinterland on either coast in Thrace and Asia Minor. Constantinople, however, was to be a free port.
6. Will an alliance that requires all members to agree to go war on behalf of one of its member states if it appears that that member started a war? Would Spain, France and Belgium go to war in Asia Minor to defend either a Turkish Junta or Islamist Dictatorship that initiated a ground conflict with Russia?

7. What will the USA do? Nothing. Lame duck President who has no desire to get in a war with Russia as his legacy. China? They are smart. They win regardless of what happens.

8. Would Russia want a war to cover economic problems? No. That is too easy. This has deeper roots than that.

In very broad strokes, here is how it happens.
1. Russia builds its support for Assad including significant air support, special forces, and limited ground forces. At the same time, it arms and encourages the Kurds.
2. Consolidating their positions to defensible lines in Iraq and eastern Syria, the Kurds proclaim a republic. The Kurdish Republic is immediately recognized by Russia, Belarus, NORK, Cuba, a handful of African nations, and surprisingly, Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria. Assad will permit Syrian Kurds to join the Kurdish Republic, and declares an alliance with the new Kurdish Republic against the Islamic State.
3. The PKK expands terrorist operations inside Turkey. Turkey responds as expected, and violence spirals.
4. Inside Russia proper, a large-casualty terrorist attack linked to the Islamic State takes place. Russia moves significant maneuver forces in to Syria in order to punish the Islamic State.
5. Combined Russian, Syrian, and Kurdish forces invest Raqqa.
6. In what appears to be a move to ... well no one knows for sure, the Turks say they were pursuing PKK formations ... significant Turkish ground forces move south down the E99 through the Syrian frontier town of Tell Abiad. Russian forces are mostly arrayed north of Raqqa with logistic support along the M4. For some reason, the Turkish air force bombed a meeting between Russian and Kurdish officials in Maaroûda. After that, Russian forces originally destined for the final push on Raqqa coming down the M4, instead wheeled north and the rest, as they say, is history.
7. Turkey finds itself under attack from Russian ground forces in the south, Georgia has allowed free passage of Russian forces to reinforce Armenia. The Kurdish areas on Turkey are in the midst of a full uprising.
8. Turkey invoked Article 5 of the NATO treaty ... and ... there is nothing but turmoil in Brussels.
9. Turkey moved its best forces south against Russian and Kurdish forces, its second line forces to the east against what it thought would be a threat from the Armenian border, but nothing happened in what ended up just being a message to the Azeri to behave. 

European Turkey, the Dardanelles, and Istanbul was defended by third line garrison forces and undermanned mainline units in a huge strategic error in light of the rather conventional Russian invasion that followed. 

Its navy largely sunk pierside and after two days of respectful fighting, the Turkish airforce ran short of enough serviceable aircraft to defend its airspace from Russian strike aircraft, not to mention the cruise missile and conventional ballistic missile strikes that took out what little remaining TACAIR could be made serviceable. 

All that remained from then is to try to manage the millions of people in greater Istanbul who took the Russian advice that they needed to gather what they could and leave.

NATO does nothing as Turkey, beset by internal divisions between their military and Islamists with a full Kurdish uprising folds. 

That part of the world has seen and survived mass migration before.

Nothing is written.




Standard Black Swan disclaimer: I am not predicting anything. I am simply playing out the possible but improbable ... because that is how history happens.

Saturday, September 05, 2015

Friday, September 04, 2015

Fullbore Friday

Back in April, we saw an attitude, an ethos, the American way of war at the personal level.

Gunnery Sgt. Brian Jacklin, USMC received the Navy Cross demonstrating that tradition;
“We don’t retreat. We stand our ground,”
Via Jennifer Hlad at S-n-S;
The opening shots of an enemy attack paralyzed the team leader from the chest down and severely injured another Marine. The team was suddenly surrounded by a force seven or eight times its size. The Marines were outmanned, outgunned, trapped on a rooftop and in desperate need of a medical evacuation helicopter.

It was the heaviest fire that Gunnery Sgt. Brian Jacklin has seen in 10 years of heavy combat experience. But he remained calm, organizing a counterattack and calling for a helicopter.

On Thursday, Jacklin was awarded the Navy Cross for his heroism during that battle, which retired Marine Capt. Derek Herrera said is the reason he is alive today.

Jacklin said that he was honored and overwhelmed by the medal, but that the Marines “really had no choice” but to fight back.

When a friend is injured, Jacklin said, Marines do everything they can to save his life.

“We don’t retreat. We stand our ground,” he said.

Once Jacklin had secured a helicopter for the injured Marines, he said the team had to breach a wall and run across a field under intense fire to reach the landing zone. He asked whether everyone was OK with the plan, and there wasn’t a second of hesitation, he said.

At the landing zone, the Marines used their bodies to shield their wounded teammates. Once the team was relieved by a SEAL team, Jacklin and David Harris voluntarily stayed behind to continue the fight.

Thursday, September 03, 2015

Diversity Thursday

The language Stalinists are about to complete their takeover of the USCG; the politics of micro-aggressions has arrived. The diktat of the Gender Studies Department has become policy.

The full implemention of the Cultural Marxist ethos will march forward until both leaders and the mass of people actively and passively reject their agenda.


There is no reason to parody. There is no reason to pick apart paragraph by paragraph. This intellectual cancer speaks for itself that is being pushed by RDML P. DeQuattro, USCG.


Read it all and BEHOLD!


R 212352Z AUG 15
FM COMLANTAREA COGARD PORTSMOUTH VA
TO ALLCGLANT
INFO COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CG-00H/CG-12B/CG-133//
COMPACAREA COGARD ALAMEDA CA
COMCOGARD FORCECOM NORFOLK VA
BT
UNCLAS //N05351//
SUBJ: FY15-17 LANTAREA LEADERSHIP AND DIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (LDAP)
A. COMMANDANT DIRECTION 2011
B. COMDTINST 5350.9
C. DUTY TO PEOPLE: LEADERSHIP AND DIVERSITY IN ATLANTIC AREA
211938Z AUG 15
D. Commandant Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan, 2015-2018
1. Purpose: This message summarizes our FY14 leadership, diversity, and inclusion accomplishments and sets forth our goals for the next two years to improve leadership, diversity, and inclusion within Atlantic Area.
2. Progress: Over the past year we have made significant improvements in our leadership, diversity, and inclusion efforts. The focus for these efforts was identified by the LANTAREA
Leadership and Diversity Climate Survey (LDCS) which led to the following actions:
A. The Area Diversity Staff worked with the Chaplains and Command Master Chief (CMC) networks to address concerns brought to light by the LDCS. These groups have since used this information in their various workshops as best practices and as issues to be included in future trainings.
B. LANT Theater Leadership and Diversity Advisory Council (TLDAC) updated its web sites with information on LGBT community, SAPR issues, and responses to leadership challenges based on feedback from field units.
C. The TLDAC, using LDCS data, identified four diversity focus areas requiring improvement: organizational trust; gender; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT); and civilian/military relationships. The TLDAC then organized focus groups with participants from across LANTAREA to develop a more in-depth understanding of these issues.
3. Action: From their analysis of the LDCS results, the TLDAC identified the following actions to improve the work climate related to the four areas:
A. Organizational Trust.
LDAC Issue: Many diversity issues appear to be linked to leaders not modeling inclusive behaviors or unknowingly acting in ways that promote disrespect or bias toward certain groups (also known
as micro-biases or micro-aggressions).
Action 1: TLDAC members will research and author articles on leadership, diversity and inclusion in the Coast Guard that can help leaders at every level understand behaviors that could be perceived negatively by various groups.
Action 2: All units with LDACs are reminded, as per Ref D, to conduct training on this topic for their unit before 30 September 2015. For additional information, the following website has information on completing the training: https://cglink.uscg.mil/f6f4179d

Completion will be reported in the OCT 2015 LDAC Quarterly report by the unit LDAC Chairs. In addition, commands are encouraged to discuss these micro-biases or micro-aggressions during their Special Emphasis Program education events.
B. Gender.
LDAC Issue: Women are not proportionally represented in afloat billets. Given the requirement for afloat time to advance, this is negatively impacting the careers of women in the Coast Guard. Many members believe there are deliberate barriers to women going afloat.
Action: In support of a HQ-led team, (currently addressing identified barriers), conduct a women's afloat opportunity study that examines current practices and identifies opportunities for improvement. Ensure the progress of these efforts is communicated to our workforce.
C. LGBT.
LDAC Issue: There are significant misunderstandings or lack of information regarding programs or benefits available to LGBT members.
Action 1: Develop a consolidated list of CG policy and guidance on LGBT entitlements and specific concerns.
Action 2: In coordination with CG-1, identify barriers, benefits and draw backs in, a policy allowing LGBT members to state a preference to not transfer to states with restrictive laws regarding the LGBT community. This evolving policy or guidance will need to balance the need to develop members and needs of the service while protecting individual rights.
D. Civilian/ Military Relations.
LDAC Issue: Many civilian and military members do not understand each other's rating and personnel management systems.
Action: Work with CG-1 to develop Mil-Civ and Civ-Mil user friendly guides for military supervisors of civilians and civilian supervisors of military personnel.
E. More information regarding these focus areas can be found at: https://cglink.uscg.mil/bc592093. Units are encouraged to have representatives join/support one of the theater-level work groups. As work group products are completed, they will be sent to unit LDACs for implementation or integration. POCs for theater work groups are: organizational trust - OSC Daniel G. [redacted]; gender - LT Anne F. [redacted]; LGBT - IT2 Daniel C. [redacted]; and Civilian/Military relations - LTJG Morgan E. [redacted].
F. In addition to these theater-wide actions, all units within LANTAREA are reminded of their requirement to develop a unit-specific leadership and diversity action plan (LDAP) IAW LANTAREAINST 5351.1. This plan should address one or more unit- specific diversity and inclusion issues resulting from the LDCS as well as at least one of the four identified focus areas (organizational trust, gender, LGBT, Civilian/Military relations). The LDAP Form and amplifying worksheet can be found on https://cglink.uscg.mil/7e4c66d2. Small units (less than 50) that are part of a larger unit LDAC will fall under the larger units LDAP. Units are encouraged to use findings from local focus groups or suggestions listed on the TLDAC website, https://cglink.uscg.mil/5e456e20
G. For other LDAC resources and best practices visit the LANTAREA TLDAC SharePoint site at:
http://d11ms-zeswss01/sites/LANT/LDAC/default.aspx
4. Questions or suggestions regarding LDAC or Leadership and Diversity Inclusion should be directed to CDR Heather [redacted], LANTAREA Leadership and Diversity Officer, 757-398-[redacted].
5. RDML P. DeQuattro, Deputy Commander LANTAREA sends.
6. Internet release is authorized.
BT
NNNN

© 2015 Microsoft Terms Privacy & cookies Developers English (United States)

You Always Neglect Those Closest to You

So, in one part of summer, we have shark week.  It seems, in a fashion, that the end of summer is arctic week.

A busy place.

Wednesday, September 02, 2015

Moral Courage When the Call Comes

For those who have been following the case of LtCol Kate Germano, USMC I highly recommend that you take the opportunity to hear from her first person. Well worth your time to read her post at USNIBlog;
...for all of our talk of core values and ethics in the Marine Corps, many individuals I served with were more concerned with being liked than making difficult but necessary decisions. Some careerist commanders demonstrated that when assessing leadership, the words “negative command climate” carried far more weight than an officer’s actual ability to hold subordinates accountable for conduct and performance.
To that end, the greatest danger facing the military is not ISIS, but the failure of leaders to do the right thing even if it means being viewed as a problem by their superiors. As military officers, we must be willing to make difficult decisions, even when they are not popular. We must be able to look in the mirror and be satisfied with the person we see. We must also be willing to accept the consequences of decisions made on principle.
...
As military leaders, we must have the moral courage to make difficult decisions in the interest of our subordinates, our service, and our nation, no matter what the consequence. We must recognize that service is not about being popular and liked, but is about getting results.

In Europe, Realty Sets In of the Europe That Is

The waves of migration will continue for years if nothing changes. Already numbering in the hundreds of thousands this year alone, more are coming.

There is a push and a pull. There is the push from the conflict in the Arab world that is just building on the pressures from nations whose economic growth cannot keep pace with their population growth.

Crowded Western Europe cannot take the develping world's surplus non-Western populations.

What was once just warnings from the fringe is becoming mainstream.

Hungary is building a fence. Austria, Denmark and others are calling for border controls. The old European hope as felt by Chancellor Merkel simply will not work.

Fences, controls ... those are just two ways to address the pull. Now, even The Netherlands is making a step just a decade or two would have been considered fringe;
The Netherlands is set to impose new rules that would see asylum seekers cut off from food and shelter after “a few weeks” if their application is rejected.

While Germany opened up its doors to make it easier for those arriving at its borders and France criticised Hungary over its new 110-mile razor wire fence, the Dutch government was going in a different direction.

From November, any migrant who refused refugee status or humanitarian protection will be given less than a month before they are deported or told to fend for themselves.

As part of the measures, the government wants to shut down 30 regional “bed, bath and bread” centres where asylum seekers can find shelter, regardless of the status of their application.
This is just a simple first step. More will follow.

Just yesterday, the President of the Czech Republic, Milos Zeman said.
“Of course I would wish for the EU to strengthen its borders, but I don’t see any real action,” Zeman told reporters in Prague castle on Monday. “Therefore I believe the Czech Republic should take of its borders alone and expel illegal immigrants from the borders, including with the use of the army.”