What does it look like when the military is told to "make it happen" for political ends, knows it isn't possible, but with a squinted eye and a bit of creative painting makes it look like they're following orders?
^^^ That is my optimistic view of the satire-proof letter from NAVSEA.
This is ... ambitious.
First thing I thought of was what we did to the SPRUANCE class when they were in their early 20s.
Second thing is ... how are we going to do this with the present operational tempo and expect funding for the next decade or so?
We can't, something will have to change.
Some of these ships are already not in the best shape - especially the cruisers.
Something will have to change.
Is this realistic, or simply aspirational signaling to meet a tasker now, knowing that a few PCS cycles down the road other people will have to deal with it?
^^^ That is my pessimistic view of the letter.
Para 2 is the emergency hatch that pretty much negates the rest. See my opening to this post; that is where I'm putting my bet.
I don't know about you, but I feel slimy just reading this - but sometimes you have to do slimy things.
It is not an impressive document by any stretch of the imagination for anyone involved in it.
Not one of our Navy's best moments.
No comments:
Post a Comment